2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-016-0185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

osFP: a web server for predicting the oligomeric states of fluorescent proteins

Abstract: BackgroundCurrently, monomeric fluorescent proteins (FP) are ideal markers for protein tagging. The prediction of oligomeric states is helpful for enhancing live biomedical imaging. Computational prediction of FP oligomeric states can accelerate the effort of protein engineering efforts of creating monomeric FPs. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first computational model for predicting and analyzing FP oligomerization directly from the amino acid sequence.ResultsAfter data curation, an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rigorous 10-fold CV and independent validation test with ten independent rounds of these classifiers based on the optimal feature subset are reported in Table 6 and Figure 5. The more details of the parameter optimization of these three classifiers were described in the works [37,38,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Based the independent validation test, we noticed that the Ac, MCC and auROC values of iQSP were higher than those of other classifiers by >2%, >4%, and >2%, respectively, suggesting that iQSP holds very high potential to provide an accurate and reliable result in unseen peptides when compared to the existing methods and the conventional classifiers developed in this study.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rigorous 10-fold CV and independent validation test with ten independent rounds of these classifiers based on the optimal feature subset are reported in Table 6 and Figure 5. The more details of the parameter optimization of these three classifiers were described in the works [37,38,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Based the independent validation test, we noticed that the Ac, MCC and auROC values of iQSP were higher than those of other classifiers by >2%, >4%, and >2%, respectively, suggesting that iQSP holds very high potential to provide an accurate and reliable result in unseen peptides when compared to the existing methods and the conventional classifiers developed in this study.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of feature importance can provide valuable information for predicting its function and activity. Previously, AAC has been used for analyzing the inherent characteristics and patterns of many therapeutic peptides [36][37][38][39][40][41] and protein functions [42][43][44]. In this study, the mean decrease of Gini index (MDGI) was utilized to rank the importance of each AAC feature.…”
Section: Composition Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, experiment #9 was not in the three-top ranked experiments over 10-fold CV, it provides a promising result in terms of ACC, MCC, and auROC with 92.52%, 0.846, and 0.948, respectively, which was not significantly different from the result of experiment #3 (95.11%, 0.894, and 0.966). Moreover, due to the fact that the independent test was the most rigorous cross-validation method to demonstrate the robustness and reliability of the model in real-world applications [17][18][19][20]28,29,31,33,[39][40][41], it could be noted that experiment #9 provided an important contribution to PVP prediction. For convenience, the best PVP predictor based on the SCM method in conjunction with the propensity scores of dipeptides from experiment #9 would be referred to as PVPred-SCM.…”
Section: Prediction Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The m-NGSG feature extraction method was also compared with other generalized extraction methods. Here, the Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSAR) based feature generation method (Simeon et al, 2016) was implemented on the Subchlo60 data set from Subcholo model, and compared with the m-NGSG feature generation model. A logistic regression classifier was used with a regularization parameter of C=1, and evaluated using Jackknife, 5-fold, and 10-fold cross validation.…”
Section: Meta-comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%