1966
DOI: 10.2307/1293626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic Theory: An Example of Lag between Research and Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several attempts primarily directed at biologists to set the record straight on the physical basis of osmosis (Stein, 1966; Kiil, 1982; Kramer and Myers, 2012), as well as accounts of the Debye model in journals (Manning, 1968; Oster and Peskin, 1992; Borg, 2003; Marbach and Bocquet, 2019; Song et al, 2021) and textbooks (Benedek and Villars, 1974; Weiss, 1996; Baumgarten and Feher, 2011; Nelson, 2014), but despite these efforts, misconceptions have persisted. The apparent simplicity of osmosis may have masked what is at bottom a rather subtle phenomenon with enormous implications for biology (Dick, 1966; House, 1974; Andersen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several attempts primarily directed at biologists to set the record straight on the physical basis of osmosis (Stein, 1966; Kiil, 1982; Kramer and Myers, 2012), as well as accounts of the Debye model in journals (Manning, 1968; Oster and Peskin, 1992; Borg, 2003; Marbach and Bocquet, 2019; Song et al, 2021) and textbooks (Benedek and Villars, 1974; Weiss, 1996; Baumgarten and Feher, 2011; Nelson, 2014), but despite these efforts, misconceptions have persisted. The apparent simplicity of osmosis may have masked what is at bottom a rather subtle phenomenon with enormous implications for biology (Dick, 1966; House, 1974; Andersen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%