Osseointegration Implant Post Coupling With External Prosthetic Limb – Continuation of Previous Case Reports “Stage III”

Hillock, Ronald; Tatum, Bcp Danny; Dolegowski, PT Edward

doi:10.15438/rr.v4i2.68

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, several other devices are currently at various stages of development, particularly in Europe and the United States. [14,16,17,[22][23][24][25][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]…”

Section: Bone-anchored Prosthesis: a Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation programs after the implantation of transfemoral osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses: a systematic review protocol

Vertriest

Pather

Sondergeld

et al. 2017

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this scoping review is to characterize rehabilitation programs for individuals with transfemoral amputation following the implantation of screw-type or press-fit osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses.The secondary objective of this review is to describe partial weight bearing exercises including static and dynamic exercises as well as use of walking aids in each rehabilitation program for screw-type and press-fit fixations.The third objective of this review is to compare key rehabilitation parameters for various partial weight bearing exercises (e.g. type of training prosthesis, loading time and progression, monitoring of loading, loading direction, instructions given to patients and the use of loading regulators) within each program for screw-type and press-fit fixations (intra-variability) and between programs for screw-type and press-fit fixations (inter-variability).The specific review questions are.

show abstract

Section: Bone-anchored Prosthesis: a Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation programs after the implantation of transfemoral osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses: a systematic review protocol

Vertriest

Pather

Sondergeld

et al. 2017

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia

Frossard

Merlo

Quincey³

et al. 2017

PharmacoEconomics Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGovernmental organizations are facing challenges in adjusting procedures providing equitable assistance to consumers with amputation choosing newly available osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) over socket-suspended prostheses.ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to (1) present a procedure focusing on tasks, documents and costs of prosthetic care, and (2) share observed obstacles and facilitators to implementation.MethodsThis research aimed at developing a governmental procedure for the provision of BAPs was designed as an action research study. A total of 18 individuals with transfemoral amputation solely funded by a Queensland State organization were considered.ResultsThe procedure, developed between January 2011 and June 2015, included seven processes involving fixed expenses during treatment and five processes regulating ongoing prosthetic care expenses. Prosthetic care required 22 h of labor, corresponding to AUD$3300 per patient, during rehabilitation. Prosthetists spend 64 and 36% of their time focusing on prosthetic care and other activities, respectively. The procedure required adjustments related to the scope of practice of prosthetists, funding of prosthetic limbs during rehabilitation, and allocation of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Approximately 41% (7) and 59% (10) of obstacles were within (e.g. streamlining systematic processes, sustaining evaluation of this complex procedure) or outside (e.g. early and consistent consultations of stakeholders, lack of a definitive rehabilitation program) governmental control, respectively, and approximately 89% (17) of the facilitators were within governmental control (e.g. adapting existing processes).ConclusionThis study provides a working plan to stakeholders developing and implementing policies around the care of individuals choosing osseointegration for BAPs.

show abstract

Load characteristics following transfemoral amputation in individuals fitted with bone-anchored prostheses: a scoping review protocol

Pather

Vertriest

Sondergeld

et al. 2018

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this scoping review is to characterize loading information applied on the residuum of individuals with transfemoral amputation fitted with an osseointegrated fixation for bone-anchored prostheses.The objectives of this scoping review are: i) to map the scope of loading variables, and ii) to report the range of magnitude of loads that has been directly measured using a portable kinetic recording apparatus fitted at the distal end of the residuum during rehabilitation exercises, standardized and unscripted activities of daily living, and adverse events.The specific review questions are.

show abstract

Osseointegration Implant Post Coupling With External Prosthetic Limb – Continuation of Previous Case Reports “Stage III”

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Rehabilitation programs after the implantation of transfemoral osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses: a systematic review protocol

Rehabilitation programs after the implantation of transfemoral osseointegrated fixations for bone-anchored prostheses: a systematic review protocol

Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia

Load characteristics following transfemoral amputation in individuals fitted with bone-anchored prostheses: a scoping review protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About