Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Organ Transplant Patients Undergoing Chronic Immunosuppressive Therapy

Radzewski, Rafał; Osmola, Krzysztof

doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000916

Cited by 7 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the 28 articles selected for full-text review, seven were excluded because they described animal studies [11][12][13][14][15]19,20 , five articles represented reviews [21][22][23][24][25] , one article did not deal with solid organ transplantation but with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 26 , four articles did not have a follow-up of 6 months for the implants placed or did not include sufficient data [27][28][29][30] , and one article described implant placement before solid organ transplantation 31 . In total, 10 studies were included in the review [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] .…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The included publications were divided into two groups: case-control studies (n = 4) 35,39-41 and case series/case reports (n = 6) [32][33][34][36][37][38] . The quality of three of the case-control studies was assessed as good [39][40][41] ; the quality of the remaining case-control study was judged to be moderate, due to missing information regarding medication and a short follow-up period (24 months) 35 . All of the casecontrol studies were classified as level of evidence III according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) scale of research levels.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…None of the studies described early implant loss. Six study groups assessed marginal bone loss (MBL) in their implant evaluation 33,35,37,[39][40][41] . Of these, four study groups with a total of 109 implants gave detailed information on MBL over time, ranging from 0.18 mm to 1.3 mm (mean 0.72 mm) after 17-60 months (mean 26 months) of followup 33,35,37,40 .…”

Section: Details Of the Population And Patient Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six study groups assessed marginal bone loss (MBL) in their implant evaluation 33,35,37,[39][40][41] . Of these, four study groups with a total of 109 implants gave detailed information on MBL over time, ranging from 0.18 mm to 1.3 mm (mean 0.72 mm) after 17-60 months (mean 26 months) of followup 33,35,37,40 . The remaining two studies including 127 implants subdivided the patients into three different groups according to their MBL (MBL < 2.4 mm, MBL 2.4-3.7 mm, MBL > 3.7 mm) after a mean follow-up of 8 years and 7 years, respectively, and compared them to a healthy control group 39,41 .…”

Section: Details Of the Population And Patient Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Dental implant procedures in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients: a systematic review

Burtscher

Torre²

2022

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last decades, the number of immunosuppressed organ transplant patients has increased consistently. Nevertheless, immunosuppression has been discussed as a contraindication for dental implant procedures for many years. Hence, the purpose of this systematic review was to assess the survival rate and outcomes of dental implants after solid organ transplantation. An electronic and manual literature search was conducted up to March 2021. Publications describing dental implants placed in patients after organ transplantation were included without any limitations regarding study design or date of publication. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, leading to a sample of 93 patients with 249 implants. Implant survival rates were 100% over a mean follow-up of 60 months. In every case, implant surgery was performed under antibiotic coverage. No major medicationrelated complications were reported. Despite the limited amount of evidence in the literature, implant procedures seem to be a safe treatment option in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients. The observance of appropriate treatment protocols including a strict maintenance programme seems to be crucial for the long-term success of such treatments. However, stringent data regarding various influencing factors such as the prevalence of peri-implantitis are still missing.

show abstract

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Details Of the Population And Patient Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Details Of the Population And Patient Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dental implant procedures in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients: a systematic review

Burtscher

Torre²

2022

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With the use of diagnostic imaging software it is possible to extract the texture features. This enables a detailed assessment of the state of bone tissue, changes occurring during bone healing and achieved osseointegration [4,31,36]. A large part of the analysis of osseointegration is based on this method [8,16,26,27,29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of X-rays in bone remodelling around Active and Replace dental implants

Trochim

Borowska

Szarmach

2021

SIViP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: The purpose of the study was to examine on the basis of radiographic images of bone tissue, whether there are differences in the rate of bone remodelling using different shapes of implants in the mandible and maxilla. Moreover, the study also compares texture features obtained on the basis of these images for healthy bone tissue, bone directly after implantation and after a 12-month period of prosthetic loading. Materials and Methods: The subject of the analysis was radiovisiogram images obtained from the Medical University of Bialystok from the Department of Dental Surgery. They are radiovisiogram photographs of 146 people aged 18–74, treated implantally due to missing teeth. The whole group of patients received two types of implants (Active and Replace) of the same company, made of titanium, intraosseous, screw-in. Results: It has been shown that both in the upper jaw and the mandible, the values of texture parameters obtained for bone images made after one year of prosthetic loading are closer to healthy tissue than immediately after implantation. These values for the mandible were relatively closer to those obtained on the basis of healthy tissue than those for the upper jaw. The bone around the implant with a single threading achieved better results in the mandible than the one with a double threading. Conclusion: The type of bone tissue and the shape of the implant have an impact on the achieved osseointegration. With the passage of time and the process of bone remodelling, the damaged tissue returns to its normal structure.

show abstract

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Management for the Renal Compromised Patient

Racker

Chandra

2021

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Medically Compromised Patient

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Organ Transplant Patients Undergoing Chronic Immunosuppressive Therapy

Cited by 7 publications

References 41 publications

Dental implant procedures in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients: a systematic review

Dental implant procedures in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients: a systematic review

Analysis of X-rays in bone remodelling around Active and Replace dental implants

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Management for the Renal Compromised Patient

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About