2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000034394.75768.e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osseointegration under Immediate Loading: Biomechanical Stress–Strain and Bone Formation–Resorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several parameters have been used in past experimental and clinical studies to represent implant primary stability in experimental or clinical studies. These parameters include insertion torque [20], removal torque [21], cutting torque [22], pull-out force [21], Periotest data [21, 23], and implant stability quotient (ISQ), as derived from resonance frequency analysis [24, 25]; however, it would appear that most of these parameters are either too low in sensitivity or that the correlation between these parameters is somewhat questionable [22, 26]. Under such circumstances, finite element analysis (FEA) is an efficient technique for the evaluation of micromotion [27–29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several parameters have been used in past experimental and clinical studies to represent implant primary stability in experimental or clinical studies. These parameters include insertion torque [20], removal torque [21], cutting torque [22], pull-out force [21], Periotest data [21, 23], and implant stability quotient (ISQ), as derived from resonance frequency analysis [24, 25]; however, it would appear that most of these parameters are either too low in sensitivity or that the correlation between these parameters is somewhat questionable [22, 26]. Under such circumstances, finite element analysis (FEA) is an efficient technique for the evaluation of micromotion [27–29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to histological bone implant contacts, no significant difference between immediately loaded implants and those of delayed loaded or those of unloaded was observed. It was postulated that mechanical stimulation quite possibly enhanced bone formation (Romanos et al, 2002(Romanos et al, , 2003 Kawahara et al studied the effect of immediate loading at the implant interface in dogs and concluded that micromotion of less than 30μm did not impede bone ingrowth (Kawahara et al, 2003). For an immediate loading model with varying degrees of implant displacement, micromotion had a positive effect on bone formation around a roughened implant surface and a negative effect on a turned implant surface (Vandamme et al, 2007).…”
Section: Immediate and Early Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varios estudios se han focalizado en la disminución del período de espera establecido por Brånemark en implantes unitarios en zonas estéticas maxilares, temporizándolos inmediatamente, obteniendo tasas de sobrevida implantarias y protésicas sobre el 90% (5,6,7) . El resultado teórico de una temporización o estética inmediata radica en la minimización de los micro movimientos intra óseos, logrados al obtener valores de torque de inserción superior a 35 NTw (8)(9)(10)(11) , gracias a los mejoramientos en el diseño macro y microscópico de los actuales implantes que se encuentran en el mercado, y a la protección de la estructura protésica temporal de una carga oclusal directa, debido a la presencia de piezas dentarias vecinas al espacio desdentado a implantar.Clínicamente la opción de temporizar una pieza inmediatamente es un tratamiento de elección en la actualidad, ya que facilita la estética, mejora las condiciones sicológicas de espera del paciente a su restauración definitiva y facilita el proceso de oseointegración, aumentando el contacto del hueso circundate con el implante (12,13,14) . …”
unclassified