Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types

Zechner, Werner; Tangl, Stefan; Fürst, Gabor; Tepper, Gabor; Thams, Ulf; Mailath, George J.; Watzek, Georg

doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x

Cited by 158 publications

(89 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A similar study by Zechner et al in 2003 in a mini-pig model also failed to show any statistically significant effect of PRP gel on peri-implant bone formation after a 6-week healing period. 24 In another study, Weibrich et al analyzed the influence of PRP gel on bone regeneration around selftapping titanium screw implants inserted in the femoral bone of rabbits. 25 After a 4-week healing period, no advantageous effect on bone-implant contact rate was seen.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Bone Healing around Calcium Phosphate?Coated and Non-coated Oral Implants in Trabecular Bone

Nikolidakis¹,

Dolder²,

Wolke³

et al. 2006

Tissue Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of local application of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on bone healing in combination with the use of titanium implants with 2 different surface configurations was investigated. PRP fractions were obtained from venous blood sample of 6 goats and applied via gel preparation and subsequent installation in the implant site or via dipping of the implant in PRP liquid before insertion. Thirty-six implants (18 non-coated and 18 calcium phosphate (CaP) coated) were placed into the goat femoral condyles (trabecular bone). The animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks after implantation, and implants with surrounding tissue were processed for light microscopical evaluation. In addition to subjective description of the histological findings, histomorphometrical variables were also evaluated (the boneimplant contact and the bone mass adjacent to the implant). Significantly more interfacial bone-to-implant contact was observed for all 3 groups of CaP-coated implants and the titanium / liquid group (non-coated implant with PRP liquid) than for the other 2 non-coated titanium groups (with PRP gel or without PRP). The evaluation of the bone mass close to implant surface indicated that all the groups induced a significant increase of the bone mass except the PRP gel groups. On the basis of the observations, it was concluded that magnetron-sputtered CaP coatings can improve the integration of oral implants in trabecular bone. The additional use of PRP did not offer any significant effect on the bone response to the CaP-coated implants, whereas PRP in a liquid form showed a significant effect on bone apposition to roughened titanium implants during the early post-implantation healing phase.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Bone Healing around Calcium Phosphate?Coated and Non-coated Oral Implants in Trabecular Bone

Nikolidakis¹,

Dolder²,

Wolke³

et al. 2006

Tissue Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For these reasons, an implant with a highly crystalline, phosphate-enriched titanium oxide layer, characterized by a microstructured surface with 1–10 µ m pores, such as the TiUnite (Nobel Biocare Göteborg, Sweden), is expected to be particularly suitable for obtaining a successful and long-lasting osseointegration [21, 22]. Such an anodized surface, which was launched in the year 2000, has been proven to increase initial bone-to-implant contact and has shown osteoconductive properties resulting in improved maintenance of implant stability in the healing phase when compared to machined titanium implants [21–24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such an anodized surface, which was launched in the year 2000, has been proven to increase initial bone-to-implant contact and has shown osteoconductive properties resulting in improved maintenance of implant stability in the healing phase when compared to machined titanium implants [21–24]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The former also demonstrated significantly more bone within the threaded area with respect to machined micro-implants. In another study on mini-pigs, Zechner et al [21] compared titanium implants with three different surfaces: anodized, hydroxyapatite (HA) coated and machined. The authors found that both the anodized surfaced and the HA-coated implants showed significantly higher bone-to-implant contact when compared to the machined-surfaced implants [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading

Gelb

McAllister

Nummikoski

et al. 2013

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of dental implants with an anodized TiUnite surface, placed in routine clinical practice. Two clinical centers participated in the study. One hundred and seven implants (80 in the maxilla and 27 in the mandible) in 52 patients were followed in the long term. Both one- and two-stage techniques were used for 38 and 69 implants, respectively. Thirty-eight single tooth restorations and 22 fixed partial prostheses were delivered, according to a delayed loading protocol, within 4 to 12 months since implant placement. All implants were stable at insertion and at the long-term follow-up visit, which occurred between 7 and 8 years of functional loading. The mean followup was 7.33 ± 0.47 years. The mean marginal bone level change at the long-term followup as compared to baseline was 1.49 ± 1.03 mm. No implant failure occurred. Healthy peri-implant mucosa was found around 95% of implants, whereas 91% of implants showed no visible plaque at the implant surfaces at the long-term followup. The study showed that dental implants with the TiUnite anodized surface demonstrate excellent long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

show abstract

“…10 -16 It is now believed that apart from the rough surface texture, the specific topography of the implant surface influences qualitatively and quantitatively its integration. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] We refer to surface topography as the texture of the implant on a microtopographic basis, where the intimate cell and tissue interactions leading to osseointegration are based.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Characterization of Three Titanium Dental Implants

Fandridis¹,

Papadopoulos²

2008

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The examined implants had a different rough surface topography, which was directly dependent on the type of treatment used. The differences concerning the surface morphology were leading in a characteristic nanotopography, which might influence the biologic activities at the implant-tissue interface. Surface oxygen concentrations also indicated differences in the oxide layer width between the examined implants, being minimal in Osseotite Implant and maximal in Fixture MT Osseospeed.

show abstract

Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types

Cited by 158 publications

References 20 publications

The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Bone Healing around Calcium Phosphate?Coated and Non-coated Oral Implants in Trabecular Bone

The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Bone Healing around Calcium Phosphate?Coated and Non-coated Oral Implants in Trabecular Bone

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading

Surface Characterization of Three Titanium Dental Implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About