Osteogenic uni- or bilateral form of the guided rapid maxillary expansion

Al-Ouf, Khaled; Krenkel, C; Hajeer, Mohammad Y; Sakka, Salah

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.011

Cited by 19 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Certain studies have utilized a fixed orthodontic treatment prior to SARPE (Al-Ouf et al, 2010;Seeberger et al, 2010). Some studies agreed that TPA is necessary for retention (Aloise et al, 2007;Magnusson et al, 2009;Sokucu et al, 2009;Kurt et al, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Certain authors have suggested that TPA use following SARPE is unnecessary, which would accelerate the onset of fixed retainer use to immediately after expander removal (Chamberland and Proffit, 2008;Suri and Taneja, 2008;Magnusson et al, 2009;Kurt et al, 2010) or after expansion is completed (Bays and Greco, 1992;Marchetti et al, 2009;Zemann et al, 2009;Al-Ouf et al, 2010). Certain studies have utilized a fixed orthodontic treatment prior to SARPE (Al-Ouf et al, 2010;Seeberger et al, 2010). Some studies agreed that TPA is necessary for retention (Aloise et al, 2007;Magnusson et al, 2009;Sokucu et al, 2009;Kurt et al, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many of the studies on stability have assessed the dental and/or skeletal effects produced by SARPE in twodimensional (2D) methods as well as casts and/or cephalometric radiographs (Chamberland and Proffit, 2008;Suri and Taneja, 2008;Magnusson et al, 2009;Marchetti et al, 2009;Sokucu et al, 2009;Zemann et al, 2009;Al-Ouf et al, 2010;Kurt et al, 2010;Seeberger et al, 2010).…”

Section: Stability Of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion: a Randomized Trial Clinical Trialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Stability of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the orthodontic retention of maxillary skeletal stability after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE). Ninety digitized plaster casts from 30 adult patients who underwent SARPE were assessed. Thirty patients were divided equally into two groups: the No Retention Group (n = 15) and the Retention Group (n = 15) with a Transpalatal Arch [TPA]). After the end of expansion, the expander appliance was stabilized and remained in place for 4 months. The additional retention period began in the Retention Group as soon as the expander was removed and replaced by a TPA. During the same period, the No Retention Group remained without retention. The casts were created pre-operatively, at 4 months and 10 months post-expansion. The models were digitized by means of a 3D Vivid 9i laser scanner. The palatal area and volume were assessed. Both variables increased after 4 months compared with pre-operative values (p < .05). At 10 months, patients' palatal areas and volumes were stable in both groups (p > .05). In conclusion, no retention other than the expander appliance is needed after SARPE.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stability Of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion: a Randomized Trial Clinical Trialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stability of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Os métodos convencionais de expansão rápida da maxila visam o seu aumento transversal bilateralmente. Para alcançar uma expansão tanto bilateral quanto unilateral, Al-Ouf e colaboradores desenvolveram uma técnica e a publicaram no Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 1 . O guia da expansão é a estabilidade da sutura palatina mediana e, assim, emprega-se duas osteotomias de cada lado da sutura.…”

Section: Abordagem Cirúrgica Da Constrição Maxilar Unilateralunclassified

Abordagem cirúrgica da constrição maxilar unilateral

Berto

2009

Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There are numerous types of maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition and permanent dentition in terms of the applied force and the frequency of expansion activations: slow maxillary expansion (SME), rapid maxillary expansion (RME), and semi-rapid maxillary expansion (SRME) [ 1 , 2 , 4 ]. However, in adult patients when the ability to expand the maxilla through suture opening is almost absent, surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion is used as an alternative option [ 5 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes When Treating Maxillary Constriction Using a Slow Removable Versus a Rapid Fixed Expansion Appliance in the Adolescence Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rabah¹,

Al-Ibrahim²,

Hajeer³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of pain, discomfort, and functional impairments between slow and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in treating skeletal maxillary constriction in the adolescence period (i.e., between 12 and 16 years). Materials and methods The study sample consisted of 52 patients (21 males and 31 females) with maxillary skeletal constriction in the posterior region. The patients were randomly distributed into either RME (26 patients, with a mean age of 13.87 (± 1.31) years) or slow maxillary expansion group (SME, 26 patients, with a mean age of 14.31 (± 1.19) years). The levels of pain, discomfort, and functional difficulties were assessed after 24 hours (T1), 7 days (T2), 15 days (T3), one month (T4), and four months (T5) following the onset of the expansion procedure. Results Patients in the RME group encountered significantly greater levels of pain and discomfort than those in the SME group at T1, T2, and T3 (p>0.001). Chewing and swallowing difficulties were significantly greater in the RME group at T1, T2, T3, and T4 (P≤0.001). The pressure on soft tissue was greater in the RME group at T2 and T3 (p>0.001). After four months (T5), the levels of pain and discomfort decreased to their lowest levels, as well as the difficulties of chewing and swallowing, and the pressure on soft tissue were almost non-existent in both groups. Conclusion Patients treated with the removable slow maxillary expander reported lower levels of pain and discomfort, fewer chewing and swallowing difficulties, and less pressure on soft tissues than those treated with the bonded rapid maxillary expander. These difficulties gradually decreased over time in both groups. The lower levels of pain and discomfort may make the SME an effective and comfortable treatment alternative for adolescents with skeletal maxillary constriction.

show abstract

Osteogenic uni- or bilateral form of the guided rapid maxillary expansion

Cited by 19 publications

References 15 publications

Stability of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion

Stability of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion

Abordagem cirúrgica da constrição maxilar unilateral

Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes When Treating Maxillary Constriction Using a Slow Removable Versus a Rapid Fixed Expansion Appliance in the Adolescence Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About