1982
DOI: 10.3109/17453678208992839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoinductivity of Partially Decalcified Alloimplants in Healing of Large Osteoperiosteal Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decalcified bone graft has shown to be an osteoinductive and osteoconductive material under various experimental conditions. The insignificant immunological reaction refutes the concerns about the antigenicity 102627. Winkler et al 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The decalcified bone graft has shown to be an osteoinductive and osteoconductive material under various experimental conditions. The insignificant immunological reaction refutes the concerns about the antigenicity 102627. Winkler et al 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…9,11 An increase in osteogenic cells was seen on the 20th postoperative day in autografts (30-75%), while it was slightly delayed in allografts and was seen on the 30th postoperative day (45-80%). The osteogenic activity was comparable for controls, autografts and allografts on the 40th postoperative day.…”
Section: Garg Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In developing countries with a perennial power shortage, the partially decalcified allogenic bone (decalbone) has been shown to be a good substitute for autografts in various clinical and experimental studies. 6,7,9,10,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The current problems of graft relate less to technique and more to cellular events that occur during the early phase of graft uptake. Earlier experimental studies with bone grafts in animals cannot always be extrapolated to humans.…”
Section: Objective: To Conceptualize With Fine Needle Aspiration Cytmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous publications in which the authors have addressed the osteogenic capacity of various skeletal tissues and their combinations, or specially treated tissue derivatives (Burwell 1966 Lindholm et al 1982, Volpon et al 1982, Gupta & Tuli 1982, Cummine et al 1983, Wittbjer et al 1983. McDavid et al (1979) found that porous ceramic implants impregnated with bone mattow had bone formation within the pores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%