2016
DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteointegration in Cranial Bone Reconstruction: A Goal to Achieve

Abstract: These results confirm that porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds, uniquely possessing chemico-physical and morphological/mechanical properties very close to those of bone, can be considered as a tool to provide effective bone regeneration in large cranial bone defects. Moreover, they may potentially prevent most of the postsurgical drawbacks related to the use of metal or plastic implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteogenesis occurs most frequently through osteoconductivity mechanism. This is a three-dimensional process in which the biomaterial for augmentation acts as a matrix for the capillary proliferation, and the migration of proosteoblasts forms the adjacent tissue [ 17 , 18 ]. Osteoconductive materials cannot be used in the reconstruction of large bone defects, since bone formation is limited by the distance on which the replacement material is applied [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteogenesis occurs most frequently through osteoconductivity mechanism. This is a three-dimensional process in which the biomaterial for augmentation acts as a matrix for the capillary proliferation, and the migration of proosteoblasts forms the adjacent tissue [ 17 , 18 ]. Osteoconductive materials cannot be used in the reconstruction of large bone defects, since bone formation is limited by the distance on which the replacement material is applied [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bioactivity and effective osteointegration of a bone scaffold are key aspects to trigger and sustain bone regeneration in critical size defects [51]. In this respect, the approach presented in this work enabled the preparation of Sr-substituted HA cements with controlled and biomimetic composition, with defined strontium content replacing calcium in the lattice of HA, associated to excellent injectability, cohesion, and stable compressive strength enabling mechanical loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting alternative is in the use of synthetic porous HA ceramic that, due to its good bioactivity deriving from biomimetic composition, can stimulate new bone formation and tight integration of bone to the prosthesis, with recovery of the original biomechanical performance [34,35]. Despite the advantages, HA is reported to have the tendency to fragmentation due to its brittle character, typical of ceramic materials [28], which do not allow its use for load-bearing bone (e.g., femur, tibia, and metatarsus) reconstruction.…”
Section: Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds For Bone Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%