2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Otoacoustic emission suppression in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder and speech in noise perception deficits

Abstract: Results indicate that suppression is influenced by the time window analysed, and ear tested, and is associated with speech recognition in babble performance in children with central auditory processing disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymmetry between right and left ears is not uncommon and it is found in different audiometric tests (McFadden, 1993; Khalfa and Collet, 1996; Khalfa et al, 1997; Veuillet et al, 2007; DeLeon et al, 2012). Correlation of OAE suppression and SinB failure in APD diagnosed children has been recently documented (Iliadou et al, 2018d) indicating a possible lesion at the level of the brainstem and beyond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Asymmetry between right and left ears is not uncommon and it is found in different audiometric tests (McFadden, 1993; Khalfa and Collet, 1996; Khalfa et al, 1997; Veuillet et al, 2007; DeLeon et al, 2012). Correlation of OAE suppression and SinB failure in APD diagnosed children has been recently documented (Iliadou et al, 2018d) indicating a possible lesion at the level of the brainstem and beyond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Muchnik et al (2004) reported a significant group difference in a slightly shorter and later time window (8-20 ms) but not when the entire CEOAE duration was (2.5-20 ms) was considered. Iliadou et al (2018) performed an overlapping (1 ms-moving window) temporal analysis; however, they did not report on group differences (high vs. low scorers in a speech-in-noise test) or the actual post-stimulus time of their time windows. Garinis et al (2008) reported marked enhancement in their study group (learning disability) in the 12 to 14 ms window.…”
Section: Within-and Across-epoch Temporal Analysis Of Ceoae Lateralities Do Not Support a Compromised Mocr In The Lid Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different studies have reported that speech is a multisensory process in which auditory perception plays a key role [4851]. Additionally, some studies have reported that MSD patients are more likely to suffer more from perceptual disorder; however, the elaborate relationship and mechanism involved in PD-associated perceptual problems are unknown [5254]. In the present study, univariate analysis showed a greater burden of perceptual problems in the MSD group than in the non-MSD group, but multivariate logistic regression analysis excluded perceptual problems as an independent risk factor for PD-associated MSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%