2017
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Our Tarkine, Our Future”: The Australian Workers Union Use of Narratives Around Place and Community in West and North West Tasmania, Australia

Abstract: The Australian Workers Union (AWU) represents the miners on the West Coast of Tasmania. When the future of mining on much of the West Coast was threatened by the environmentalists' proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine region, the union campaigned to prevent the listing. Through its embeddedness in place, the AWU was able to use a sense of place, memory and identity to construct a community campaign that moved beyond the West Coast into the North West Coast where many of the miners lived. The union… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Henry and Prince (2018), in a theoretically sharp analysis of changing agricultural markets in New Zealand, devote a mere five lines to how their empirical material was gathered and analysed. And, in a lively discussion of union organisation and place, Barton (2018) weaves union official interviews together with other sources without telling the reader who had been interviewed or why. Examples such as these might be taken to suggest that qualitative geography researchers are right to be relaxed about their descriptions of method – the proof of the pudding is in the analysis, and no one needs to wade through all that dull procedural detail.…”
Section: Procedural Detail and The Secret Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Henry and Prince (2018), in a theoretically sharp analysis of changing agricultural markets in New Zealand, devote a mere five lines to how their empirical material was gathered and analysed. And, in a lively discussion of union organisation and place, Barton (2018) weaves union official interviews together with other sources without telling the reader who had been interviewed or why. Examples such as these might be taken to suggest that qualitative geography researchers are right to be relaxed about their descriptions of method – the proof of the pudding is in the analysis, and no one needs to wade through all that dull procedural detail.…”
Section: Procedural Detail and The Secret Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the subdiscipline of labour geography since its emergence has been a critique of capital‐centric analyses of the economy and an emphasis instead on the agency of working‐class people (Peck, 2013). Yet, in the ongoing debates concerning how to conceptualise labour agency, the point here is not just that an abstract focus on “capital” erases the working class, but that it can miss out the capitalists, and class conflict, as well (Barton, 2018; Kiil & Knutsen, 2016).…”
Section: The Spatial Politics Of Violence and Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This support is based on a desire to secure new jobs for its members. It also points to scalar tensions within the union movement, with the CFMMEU's support for mine ignoring both the emissions-intensive character of the industry and the strategic shift that the wider union movement is undertaking nationally to tackle transition risk (the impacts of decarbonisation policies) and generate long-term, more sustainable development and employment pathways for members (Barton, 2018;Fairbrother, 2015;Snell & Fairbrother, 2011). This regional displacement of jobs introduces a 'topological twist' (Allen, 2011, p.284) into the pro-mine coalition's argument to the extent that the proximal relationship being forged is between Brisbane workers and the mine site, not local workers and the site.…”
Section: Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regional displacement of jobs introduces a 'topological twist' (Allen, 2011, p.284) into the pro-mine coalition's argument to the extent that the proximal relationship being forged is between Brisbane workers and the mine site, not local workers and the site. It also points to scalar tensions within the union movement, with the CFMMEU's support for mine ignoring both the emissions-intensive character of the industry and the strategic shift that the wider union movement is undertaking nationally to tackle transition risk (the impacts of decarbonisation policies) and generate long-term, more sustainable development and employment pathways for members (Barton, 2018;Fairbrother, 2015;Snell & Fairbrother, 2011).…”
Section: Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 99%