2015
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1064464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OUR Walmart: a case study of connective action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially supported by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, OUR does not engage in formal collective bargaining, operate using traditional delegate structures or collect formal dues. Its leadership, deliberation and activist activity are overwhelmingly network‐led (Caraway, 2016). The union which adapted the chatbot for use in Australia, UWU, by contrast is one of Australia’s largest unions and represents over 150,000 members in a broad range of service occupations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially supported by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, OUR does not engage in formal collective bargaining, operate using traditional delegate structures or collect formal dues. Its leadership, deliberation and activist activity are overwhelmingly network‐led (Caraway, 2016). The union which adapted the chatbot for use in Australia, UWU, by contrast is one of Australia’s largest unions and represents over 150,000 members in a broad range of service occupations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connective action, digital media facilitates communication and networks between individuals who may have different backgrounds. These individuals are connected, form interpersonal trust, shared belief, and solidarity, then participate in collective action (Caraway 2015;Heberer 2016;Ingrams 2017). Connective action forms interpersonal communication that rests on symbolic inclusiveness, a framework for action, and the use of technology that gives individuals the freedom to participate in action (Gromping and Sinpeng 2018).…”
Section: Connective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While unions working in the creative and cultural sector have arguably been slow to catch up with these networked campaigns and their ways of working, it is clear that some are now adapting in order to harness the power of indignation and agency for precarious workers, amplifying that indignation across online networks in order to generate increased mobilization. Brett Caraway has examined the US case study of OUR Walmart (an online network using connective action with arms-length support from an established union) to show how technological innovations in communication, which have increased exponentially since the TV WRAP campaign, have enabled workers to engage in struggles to improve working conditions and raise wages, even in highly anti-union environments (Caraway 2016). Echoing Saundry et al, Caraway explores the central question “whether personal interactions and fluid social networks are capable of producing the sustained political participation necessary to achieve genuine social change.” While clearly seeing evidence of incremental change at Walmart as a result of workers’ connective action, later analysis more pessimistically suggests that “While personalised forms of communication may enable horizontal forms of organization and collective action, their impact may be restricted to their capacity to influence public opinion” (Caraway 2018).…”
Section: Kelly’s Pre-requisites—still In Place?mentioning
confidence: 99%