2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oust the louse: leaping behaviour removes sea lice from wild juvenile sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka

Abstract: We conducted a manipulative field experiment to determine whether the leaping behaviour of wild juvenile sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka dislodges ectoparasitic sea lice Caligus clemensi and Lepeophtheirus salmonis by comparing sea-lice abundances between O. nerka juveniles prevented from leaping and juveniles allowed to leap at a natural frequency. Juvenile O. nerka allowed to leap had consistently fewer sea lice after the experiment than fish that were prevented from leaping. Combined with past research, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, it should be noted that jumps may also be performed in response other drivers, such as salmon lice infestations (Samsing et al. 2015; Atkinson et al. 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, it should be noted that jumps may also be performed in response other drivers, such as salmon lice infestations (Samsing et al. 2015; Atkinson et al. 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of sea lice, the counting protocol itself could be improved, for example by discontinuing the use of dip nets to avoid dislodging lice (Godwin et al 2015). The current protocol requires high diligence to minimize or retrieve dislodged sea lice; this is especially true for the highly mobile C. clemensi (Saksida et al 2015, Atkinson et al 2018, which could explain why our results indicated that C. clemensi are more underestimated than L. salmonis.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to Jansen et al (2012), we model monthly louse counts per 10 fish (i.e., we multiplied the mean monthly counts by 10) and assume a negative binomial error distribution:NL,t,fnegative binomialnormalμL,t,f,normalρnormalLwhere N L, t , f is the reported mean motile louse count per 10 fish in month t on farm f , µ L, t , f is the predicted mean motile louse count per 10 fish for that month and farm, and ρ L is the negative binomial shape parameter, fit as an additional free parameter. We allowed the shape parameter of the negative binomial to vary between species because one key relationship that drives overdispersion is the ratio of immigrants to births (Bolker 2008); the relative contributions of colonization and on‐farm population growth to counts are likely to be very different between C. clemensi and L. salmonis due to the large difference in their mobility among hosts (Saksida et al 2015, Atkinson et al 2018). Using the negative binomial prevents complications associated with zero counts because, unlike the gamma distribution, the negative binomial distribution allows for zeros.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atlantic and pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) salmon increase their leaping and rolling activity when exposed to louse copepodids (Grimnes & Jakobsen 1996;Webster et al 2007), and this behaviour can reduce new infestations by up to 31% (Bui et al 2018c). Motile lice are also removed in this way by sockeye salmon (O. nerka; Atkinson et al 2018). As salmonids evolved new 'mechanical delousing' behaviours, lice may in turn have evolved improved attachment ability.…”
Section: Selection For Improved Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%