2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and stent thrombosis: Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention under mild therapeutic hypothermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our final analysis included five studies with a total of 290 patients. One study was a prospective randomized-controlled trial [ 2 ], while two studies were prospective non-randomized [ 1 , 6 ] and two studies were retrospective studies [ 3 , 4 ]. In those studies, TH protocols included maintaining a temperature of 32–34 °C for 12–24 h (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our final analysis included five studies with a total of 290 patients. One study was a prospective randomized-controlled trial [ 2 ], while two studies were prospective non-randomized [ 1 , 6 ] and two studies were retrospective studies [ 3 , 4 ]. In those studies, TH protocols included maintaining a temperature of 32–34 °C for 12–24 h (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further sub-group analysis showed no difference when comparing clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.37–3.24; p = 0.88) or clopidogrel versus prasugrel (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.09–1.51; p = 0.17) ( P interaction = 0.24). In-hospital all-cause mortality (reported in three studies) was not statistically different between clopidogrel 20 (24.4%) and newer agents 11 (15.5%) (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.72–2.65; p = 0.34; I 2 = 0%) [ 1 , 4 , 6 ]. Similarly, three studies reported major bleeding events [ 1 , 4 , 6 ], and no significant difference was detected between clopidogrel 8 (9.8%) and newer agents 7 (9.9%) (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.33–2.40; p = 0.82; I 2 = 0%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high rate of stent thrombosis observed in some studies in resuscitated MI patients treated with MTH and primary PCI may be caused by insufficient inhibition of P2Y 12 platelet receptors [23,24,[36][37][38][39][40]. In an observational study published by Gouffran et al [24], 10.9% of OHCA survivors treated with MTH had stent thrombosis (the latter occurred in 4.2% of patients on clopidogrel, 18.2% on prasugrel, and 16.7% on ticagrelor).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an observational study published by Gouffran et al [24], 10.9% of OHCA survivors treated with MTH had stent thrombosis (the latter occurred in 4.2% of patients on clopidogrel, 18.2% on prasugrel, and 16.7% on ticagrelor). Jiménez-Brítez et al [37] reported in-hospital stent thrombosis in 7.1% of patients, exclusively those treated with clopidogrel (11.4%), while no stent thrombosis occurred in patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel. Joffre et al [23] found cardiac arrest treated with MTH to be an independent risk factor for confirmed stent thrombosis (odds ratio = 12.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-124.6, p = 0.027) regardless of the type of P2Y 12 antagonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%