Vehicular Technologies: Increasing Connectivity 2011
DOI: 10.5772/14671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outage Performance and Symbol Error Rate Analysis of L-Branch Maximal-Ratio Combiner for κ-μ and η-μ Fading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V SIMULATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS As mentioned previously, MRC SEP (for non-coherent detection) performances will be examined via Monte Carlo simulations and theoretical expression (14). Because there are many parameters that appear in derived expressions, and because of the page limit, we will have to limit this discussion to the most interesting cases.…”
Section: A Non-coherent Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…V SIMULATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS As mentioned previously, MRC SEP (for non-coherent detection) performances will be examined via Monte Carlo simulations and theoretical expression (14). Because there are many parameters that appear in derived expressions, and because of the page limit, we will have to limit this discussion to the most interesting cases.…”
Section: A Non-coherent Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ω ranges from 0 dB to 15 dB. Figures 1-6 clearly show that theoretical expressions used are correct, because theoretical results concur with simulations results extremely well.Figures 1 and 2show SEP for L=1, L=2, and L=3 for NC-BFSK and NCDBPSK, respectively.Figures 3-6show average SEP L=2 (dual-branch combining), as an most interesting case of combining (as stated in[14] and[15]) for various values of parameters η and μ , and for different modulation formats. By examining figures 1 and 2 for 1% of average SEP, we can see that we gained approximately 6dB for L=2, and 8dB for L=3, compared to the case with no combining (L=1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%