2007
DOI: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e318030452e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome Measurement for Patients Receiving Hearing Aid Services

Abstract: The IOI-HA was implemented easily with little incremental cost. An annual project such as the one described can be used to demonstrate to administrators, patients, and payers that the clinic's rehabilitative hearing aid services have positive outcomes and that program quality is being monitored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
2
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
21
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is needed to assess the impact of such services and the effects provided for by the use of individual hearing aids (HA) (7) , in order to ensure the effectiveness of treatment (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is needed to assess the impact of such services and the effects provided for by the use of individual hearing aids (HA) (7) , in order to ensure the effectiveness of treatment (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations for this observation may include high expectations from the device prior to use, improper device choice as a result of prices, and technical problems with the device [10,16,17]. According to a previous IOI-HA questionnaire result conducted with 232 patients, device type and the degree of hearing loss are not significant components of patient satisfaction, however the level of the hearing loss influenced the duration of daily HA usage [17]. Daily HA usage duration is important for adaptation to the device and successful application [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 11 questions, "very much" indicated total satisfaction and was scored 7, whereas "not at all" indicated complete dissatisfaction and was scored 1. The other four questions were inverted, where "very much" indicated complete dissatisfaction and scored 1, whereas "not at all" indicated overall satisfaction and scored 7 [13,25,26] .…”
Section: Satisfaction With Amplification In Daily Life (Sadl)mentioning
confidence: 99%