2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Single-Bundle Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Versus the Transtibial Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies for the transtibial group [2,5], but not for independently drilled tunnels. However, at short-term followup, the study groups were comparable in terms of knee stability and patient-reported outcomes.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies for the transtibial group [2,5], but not for independently drilled tunnels. However, at short-term followup, the study groups were comparable in terms of knee stability and patient-reported outcomes.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Two recently published meta-analyses [2,5] showed that ACL reconstruction with independently-drilled tunnels results in more anatomic femoral and tibial bone tunnels. In particular, the femoral posterolateral bundle of the ACL is missed with the transtibial technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these technique variations may lead to a shorter tibial tunnel and intra-articular tibial tunnel aperture widening. 21,22 Recently, Chen et al 23 performed a meta-analysis of the outcome of singlebundle hamstring ACL reconstruction using the AM versus the transtibial technique. They reported the superiority of the surgeon-recorded stability according to the International Knee Documentation Committee knee score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test for the AM technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39, 40 Anatomic ACL reconstruction has been widely shown to result in improved knee joint kinematics, resulting in better knee health, but has been also reported to be associated with an increased re-tear rate due to increased in-situ graft forces. 4144 Furthermore, graft fixation methods, time to return to sports, activity level, trunk and lower extremity muscle function, generalized ligamentous laxity, age, gender, presence of associated injuries such as under-appreciated meniscal tears or anterolateral rotatory instability, and bony morphology of the knee and extremity can all contribute to graft survival in primary ACL reconstruction. 45, 46, 21, 47, 14, 48, 49 …”
Section: Factors Contributing To Primary Acl Reconstruction Failurementioning
confidence: 99%