1997
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists.

Abstract: Interventional radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters via the right internal jugular vein showed equal or better long-term results than those reported for surgical placement. Interventional radiologic placement should be the method of choice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, subclavian vein catheters are not recommended because of the high possibility of stenosis. However, if catheters cannot be placed in the above mentioned veins, a temporary catheter may be placed in the subclavian vein opposite the AVF (Trerotola et al,1997).…”
Section: Use Of Central Venous Catheters Their Complications and Trementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, subclavian vein catheters are not recommended because of the high possibility of stenosis. However, if catheters cannot be placed in the above mentioned veins, a temporary catheter may be placed in the subclavian vein opposite the AVF (Trerotola et al,1997).…”
Section: Use Of Central Venous Catheters Their Complications and Trementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When treating it, air intake should be stopped immediately, air should be aspirated from the right ventricle if the catheter is still in place, the patient should be brought to an upside-down, on-the-left-side position and resuscitation process including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and oxygen support should be initiated (Heckmann et al,2000). Therefore, while the occurrence of complications is around 6% even in competent hands (Bour & Weaver, 1990), it comes down to 0.8% with the use of USG (Trerotola et al, 1997). The said complication percentage is less in jugular vein catheterization than in subclavian vein catheterization (Feldman, 1996).…”
Section: Early Complications That Develop During and After Catheter Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The vast superiority of ultrasound guidance is similarly beyond dispute. 8 At our institution the total cost of a temporary CVC placement in radiology is C$250 with an average total procedure time of 15 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the placement, use and complications of CVCs placed for other indications such as hemodialysis, parenteral nutrition, chemotherapy and antibiotic therapy, which are well reported. 6,7 We report our experience of placement of large bore dual lumen CVCs for apheresis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the incidence of procedure-related complications in central venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance is only 0.8% (Trerotola et al 1997). Ultrasound-guided catheterization also limits the incidence of failures related to catheter insertion and reduces complications and necessity of multiple punctures of a vessel (Randolph et al 1996).…”
Section: Catheterization-related Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%