2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes assessment in rotator cuff pathology: what are we measuring?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This methodology has been used in several prior studies and was chosen to focus inclusion on high-impact orthopaedic literature. 1,2,7,8 Six cardinal domains were considered in this literature review, comprising reporting of outcomes related to pain, satisfaction, objective knee function, subjective knee function, patientreported outcomes (PROs), and progression of degenerative joint disease. Any article related to surgical treatment of patients with focal articular cartilage defects of the knee was included for review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This methodology has been used in several prior studies and was chosen to focus inclusion on high-impact orthopaedic literature. 1,2,7,8 Six cardinal domains were considered in this literature review, comprising reporting of outcomes related to pain, satisfaction, objective knee function, subjective knee function, patientreported outcomes (PROs), and progression of degenerative joint disease. Any article related to surgical treatment of patients with focal articular cartilage defects of the knee was included for review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer than one-fifth of studies reported on objective clinical findings during follow-up. Other measurements (asterisk) were as follows: patellar translation (1), threerepetition maximum straight leg raise (1), hamstring-quadriceps (HS-quad) strength ratio (1), effusion level (1), assessment of jumping on 1 leg (1), assessment of climbing stairs (1), and assessment of crouching(1). The aforementioned numbers in parentheses refer to the number, not percentage, of studies focusing on each surgical technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Such variability creates challenges in comparing results from different studies and therefore with truly understanding outcomes after treatment. 17,20 In addition, the lack of standardization will make incorporation of PROs into value-based reimbursement models challenging for both providers and payers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note, however, that multiple domains were included in individual questions, therefore allowing for an efficiency score of >1. In contrast, the ASES, which is the most commonly utilized PRO for rotator cuff tears, 10 only had mediocre efficiency. Moreover, when compared with the Constant score, the UCLA is more comprehensive and efficient; therefore, this would indicate that the UCLA score should be preferentially utilized over the Constant score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation