2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes comparison of HeRO and lower extremity arteriovenous grafts in patients with long-standing renal failure

Abstract: In access challenged patients, LEAVG and HeRO offer similar rates of secondary patency, infection, and all-cause mortality. The LEAVG required fewer interventions to maintain patency, and the HeRO maintains the benefit of utilizing the upper extremity site of venous drainage. In our practice, we prefer the HeRO to LEAVG, especially in patients with peripheral arterial disease and in the obese population, because it preserves lower extremity access options.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
33
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite comparable patencies the infection rate in the LLAVG was 29%, which was almost twice that of the HeRO rate. Steerman et al 7 describe similar rates of patency with no difference in infection between LLAVG and HeRO; however, selection bias with respect to BMI is stated. Those patients with higher body mass index in the HeRO group would be much higher risk of graft infection which may explain the differences in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite comparable patencies the infection rate in the LLAVG was 29%, which was almost twice that of the HeRO rate. Steerman et al 7 describe similar rates of patency with no difference in infection between LLAVG and HeRO; however, selection bias with respect to BMI is stated. Those patients with higher body mass index in the HeRO group would be much higher risk of graft infection which may explain the differences in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The HeRO graft represents an effective option for patients without any suitable upper extremity veins for access creation. The patency of the HeRO graft is comparable to that of the conventional graft and thigh graft , and the annual cost of the HeRO graft maintenance is moreover less than that of a tunneled catheter or thigh graft . However, there are also several disadvantages of HeRO grafts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If there is no suitable superficial vein, prosthetic AV fistula or brachiobasilic AV fistula with basilic vein transposition are required (23,24). However, if the upper limb use is not appropriate, axillary-axillary AV access (necklace graft) (25), superficial femoral vein transposition (26), axillary artery to right atrial graft (27), hemodialysis reliable outflow graft (28), and femoral AV graft could be used as alternative choices for vascular access (19)(20)(21). Autogenous AV fistula or graft AV fistula are available for femoral AV access, although the former is not preferred because of wide incision and associated complications (19,29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%