2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes following cervical disc arthroplasty: A retrospective review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this cohort, 94.5% received the Prestige and 5.5% received the ProDisc C. In the first study, 92.2% of patients were able to return to full activity levels postoperatively [21]. The second study compared postoperative activity levels of CDA and ACDF patients.…”
Section: Postoperative Activity Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this cohort, 94.5% received the Prestige and 5.5% received the ProDisc C. In the first study, 92.2% of patients were able to return to full activity levels postoperatively [21]. The second study compared postoperative activity levels of CDA and ACDF patients.…”
Section: Postoperative Activity Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective review showed a lower rate of symptom control postoperatively, a higher rate of dysphagia, and persistent axial neck pain. 24 In another study, the patients treated with hybrid constructs had faster recovery of range of motion and have had similarly good results as those with other, nonhybrid, constructs for degenerative cervical disease. 31 Hybrid constructs have been shown to be a good option for patients suffering from radiculopathy or myelopathy.…”
Section: Treatment Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Mummaneni et al 23 found that CDA patients showed improved neurologic function, more rapid return to work, and better Neck Disability Index scores in a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison with ACDF. A 7-year follow-up by the same investigators revealed that resolution of neck pain and neurologic status after CDA may be maintained beyond the short term, and that revision surgery after CDA was less frequent.…”
Section: Treatment Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complications, especially persistent cervical pain, are usually more common in patients who have more serious clinical and radiological conditions in preoperative planning. 15 In cases of multiple-level degenerative cervical disease, where each cervical disc level has a different degree of degeneration (collapsed intradiscal space, facet joint degeneration, and the presence of osteophytes or total loss of normal segment movement), the concept of a hybrid surgery was developed, which consists of a combination of the surgical techniques of arthroplasty with cervical arthrodesis such that each level can be treated individually with the technique most indicated for its degree of degeneration, avoiding unnecessary stress on the levels adjacent to the surgical approach and consequently reducing postoperative complications that impair the functional recovery of the patients. Although this surgical technique is better suited to the condition of the patient, it has disadvantages, such as increased surgical time and intraoperative blood loss, an increased rate of heterotopic ossification, the possibility of vertebral body fractures, dislocation of the implant (if not properly placed), and the possible loss of cervical lordosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%