2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.029
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes following fixation for proximal humeral fractures

Abstract: Fractures of the proximal humerus are a very common presentation in modern Trauma and Orthopaedic practice. In an ever-aging population, the incidence has dramatically increased resulting in a large socioeconomical burden. The surgical management of these injuries has evolved over the years. Patient outcomes are variable and there is no consensus on treatment approach. This review article focuses on the outcomes following fracture fixation using common surgical techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of surgical options can be employed, including closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, closed or open reduction and internal fixation [ 7 ], and arthroplasty [ 3 ]. Non-operative treatment is generally accepted for undisplaced or minimally displaced PHFs, or for displaced fractures in the elderly with low functional demands or who are not cleared for surgery [ 3 , 4 , 8 ]. The most appropriate treatment for complex PHFs (cPHFs) in the elderly is still a topic of debate, as concomitant osteoporosis and significant comminution prevent the achievement of stable fixation, so they may benefit from arthroplasty rather than osteosynthesis [ 2 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of surgical options can be employed, including closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, closed or open reduction and internal fixation [ 7 ], and arthroplasty [ 3 ]. Non-operative treatment is generally accepted for undisplaced or minimally displaced PHFs, or for displaced fractures in the elderly with low functional demands or who are not cleared for surgery [ 3 , 4 , 8 ]. The most appropriate treatment for complex PHFs (cPHFs) in the elderly is still a topic of debate, as concomitant osteoporosis and significant comminution prevent the achievement of stable fixation, so they may benefit from arthroplasty rather than osteosynthesis [ 2 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Наиболее часто используемыми методами фиксации переломов ПОПК являются накостный остеосинтез блокирующей пластиной и интрамедуллярный остеосинтез стержнем [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The most frequently used treatment options are the locking plate and the antegrade nailing. ( 5 Complications associated with locking plates include necrosis of the humeral head (35%), screw cut-out (57%) and pseudarthrosis (13%). 6 Osteosynthesis, with antegrade nailing, emerged as a viable option in the treatment for proximal humerus fractures, with the advantage of lower soft tissue dissection and superiority over plates in biomechanical studies for fractures in two parts of the surgical neck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%