“…However, 18 studies investigated in the current literature research were not used for meta‐analysis. Besides the reasoning of too short of a follow‐up (Alberga et al, 2020; Burgess et al, 2017; Ch'ng et al, 2016; Gander et al, 2014; Hessling et al, 2015; Moore et al, 2019; Pompa et al, 2015; Woods et al, 2019), the second reason for exclusion was that the studies only assessed implants placed in irradiated bone, which means they were lacking a non‐irradiated control group (Buurman et al, 2013; Curi et al, 2018; Di Carlo et al, 2019; Nack et al, 2015; Neckel et al, 2020; Papi et al, 2019; Rana et al, 2016; Sandoval et al, 2020). Ettl et al (2020) were reporting implant success using a modified version of the Albrektsson criteria (Albrektsson et al, 1986), and their study was therefore excluded.…”