2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Hyperladosteronism

Abstract: In appropriately selected patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is effective in improving long-term BP control. Larger adrenal gland size and older age at time of surgery are predictors of persisting hypertension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
48
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
48
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort of patients, 33% were normotensive and in another 49% antihypertensive medication had been reduced 12 months after the surgery. A positive effect on blood pressure was demonstrated in 82% patients, which corresponds to published studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our cohort of patients, 33% were normotensive and in another 49% antihypertensive medication had been reduced 12 months after the surgery. A positive effect on blood pressure was demonstrated in 82% patients, which corresponds to published studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have shown that independent factors for the persistence of hypertension after adrenalectomy are female sex, advanced age, increased BMI, duration of hypertension of over 6 years, more than 3 types of antihypertensive drugs used preoperatively and maximum size of the adrenal gland 15,16,[18][19][20][21][22] . Zarnegar et al proposed a scoring system predicting the benefit to patients of adrenalectomy combining four independent factors: the number of antihypertensive medications used, BMI, duration of hypertension, female sex 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, surgical cure of hypertension has been associated with the following: young age, 21,22 shorter duration of hypertension (eg, <5-10 years), fewer antihypertensive medications (eg, ≤2), higher preoperative blood pressure, preoperative normal renal function, body mass index ≤25 kg/m 2 , female sex, lack of a family history of hypertension, [23][24][25][26] and no evidence of vascular remodeling. 27 These preoperative characteristics serve to guide the clinician and the patient in discussing realistic expectations of surgical outcomes.…”
Section: Selection Of Patients For Avsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where health resources are limited, some selection policy may also be necessary to pre-empt the view that, if 5% of the hypertensive population has unilateral PA, the surgical approach is simply not feasible. 28,29 Nearly all patients with unilateral PA benefit from the surgical approach as evidenced by improved hypertension control, even if hypertension is not cured, 5,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and by longterm regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. 5 Realistically, in most public healthcare systems, priority will be given to (1) young patients, who are the most likely to become normotensive with adrenal surgery and gain the most in life-years off treatment and (2) the patients with resistant hypertension (or antihypertensive drug intolerance), whose absolute risk of cardiovascular complications is the highest.…”
Section: Selection Of Patients For Avsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies showed that BP decreases in the majority of patients but antihypertensive agents are required in a significant proportion of cases in order to achieve a normal BP. Reported rates of BP control vary between 33 and 85% (Table 1), but the definition of normal BP was not uniform in these studies, ranging between 140/90 and 160/100 mmHg (Favia et al 1992, Obara et al 1992, Simon et al 1993, Blumenfeld et al 1994, Weigel et al 1994, Celen et al 1996, Lo et al 1996, Proye et al 1998, Sirén et al 1998, Sapienza & Cavallaro 1999, Shen et al 1999, Brunt et al 2001, Sawka et al 2001, Fukudome et al 2002, Rossi et al 2002, Harris et al 2003, Meria et al 2003, Stowasser et al 2003, Goh et al 2004, Meyer et al 2005, Gockel et al 2007, Pang et al 2007. Table 2 summarizes the criteria used to establish the diagnosis of primary APA in the studies reviewed.…”
Section: Management Of Apamentioning
confidence: 96%