2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11226234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor Performance Test of Bifacial n-Type Silicon Photovoltaic Modules

Abstract: The outdoor performance of n-type bifacial Si photovoltaic (PV) modules and string systems was evaluated for two different albedo (ground reflection) conditions, i.e., 21% and 79%. Both monofacial and bifacial silicon PV modules were prepared using n-type bifacial Si passivated emitter rear totally diffused cells with multi-wire busbar incorporated with a white and transparent back-sheet, respectively. In the first set of tests, the power production of the bifacial PV string system was compared with the monofa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results are in good agreement with the experimental data reported in refs. [29][30][31] and with the calculated values reported in refs. [32,33].…”
Section: Model Extrapolations To Annual Pv Energy Yield and Effect Of...supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Such results are in good agreement with the experimental data reported in refs. [29][30][31] and with the calculated values reported in refs. [32,33].…”
Section: Model Extrapolations To Annual Pv Energy Yield and Effect Of...supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Park evaluates the outdoor performance of bifacial PV modules and string systems under different ground reflection conditions. The monthly average bifacial gain is found to vary from 6.1% (December) to 13.8% (June) under 21% ground reflection (Park et al, 2019). For the module with 79% ground reflection, the gain is found to vary from 26.0% (February) to 45.1% (August).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The calculated value of CO 2 emission reduction with two-sided cells was 16% higher compared to unilateral cells [24]. In the installations located in Korea [25], the year-round additional energy yield from double-sided panels was 10.5% when installed over a concrete floor whose albedo was 21%. With an albedo of 79% (white membrane), the increased yield reached 33.3% compared to single-sided panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%