2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor test cells for building envelope experimental characterisation – A literature review

Abstract: In the past decades the construction sector experienced the diffusion of a wide variety of complex building envelope components and passive elements and strategies, characterized by a dynamic response to the climatic parameters. Many of these components have been claimed to contribute to reducing building energy use and improving occupants' comfort. These kind of envelope elements need nevertheless to be tested under laboratory and real dynamic weather conditions in order to characterise, and possibly to model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 , categorizes those levels following an object-based logic that decomposes the façade system as a material, as a component, as a system and as part of a building. [11,33,82,60,17,48] . Material [19,49,71,18,59,64,70,31,32] The complexity of facades and in particular high-performance facades makes it intersect with different domains of knowledge.…”
Section: Towards the Assessment Of Adaptive Facades Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 , categorizes those levels following an object-based logic that decomposes the façade system as a material, as a component, as a system and as part of a building. [11,33,82,60,17,48] . Material [19,49,71,18,59,64,70,31,32] The complexity of facades and in particular high-performance facades makes it intersect with different domains of knowledge.…”
Section: Towards the Assessment Of Adaptive Facades Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] and Cattarin et al [13]. In addition, the literature review by Cattarin et al [14] presents an overview of experimental studies that used outdoor test cell facilities to validate airflow and daylight models and to characterize the performance of single building components or control systems. The review reports and discusses also the potential sources of discrepancy between measurements and numerical predictions.…”
Section: Empirical Validation Of Building Energy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each test cell is surrounded by a dedicated guard zone, thus allowing for «parallel tests of the same building envelope technology/equipment with different indoor air temperature set-points, occupancy schedules or operations», as reported by Causone et al [32]. Hence, the facility can be classified, following the criteria proposed by Cattarin et al [14], as comparative and absolute-guarded, since it is conceived to (i) simultaneously expose to the same external environment two building components installed on the south façade (comparative approach) and/or (ii) carry out performance assessments by means of a calorimetric measurement in each cell (performance expressed in absolute terms, in a guarded cell). Table 1 and Table 2.…”
Section: Description Of the Facility And Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…test cell surrounded with a guarded zone, in order to reduce the energy flow of the lateral wall), suitable for comparative test, was avoided to have a test configuration closer to reality. For these reasons the experimental activity in FACT will be coupled with simulations to evaluate absolute performance of the building technologies in a calibrated test cells [13]. In any case, given the dimension of the facility, the possibility to build a box inside the box, in order to create a guarded zone, is still open for specific project.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Characterization Protocol And Future Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published work on existing outdoor test cells, reports a classification of outdoor facility showing an extensive use of these utilities in the scientific community [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%