Output rates among coil winders.

Rothe, Harold F.; Nye, Charles T.

doi:10.1037/h0041121

Cited by 20 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…That various criterion measures bear little or no interrelation is shown again in this research as in earlier studies (Adjutant General's Office, 1943;Flanagan, 1948;Rothe & Nye, 1958). However, when conducted on a long-term basis it would appear that many of the relationships found in this study may be stable.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

A Factor Analysis of Eleven Job Performance Measures

Ronan¹

1963

Personnel Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

A Factor Analysis of Eleven Job Performance Measures

Ronan¹

1963

Personnel Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There were also 30 articles dealing with performance appraisal since 2000, but it seems clear that the period 1970 to 2000 represented the heyday of performance appraisal research in JAP. During this period, JAP published 187 articles in which performance appraisal was the primary topic (we should also note that, during this period, there were also a number, but simply reported on a new rating scale that was developed for some job or reported data on some other type of performance measure [e.g., Ferguson, 1947;Rothe & Nye, 1958], and this is the main focus of our review).…”

Section: Historical Review Of Performance Appraisal Research In Japmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?

DeNisi¹,

Murphy²

2017

Journal of Applied Psychology

396

322

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We review 100 years of research on performance appraisal and performance management, highlighting the articles published in JAP, but including significant work from other journals as well. We discuss trends in eight substantive areas: (1) scale formats, (2) criteria for evaluating ratings, (3) training, (4) reactions to appraisal, (5) purpose of rating, (6) rating sources, (7) demographic differences in ratings, and (8) cognitive processes, and discuss what we have learned from research in each area. We also focus on trends during the heyday of performance appraisal research in JAP (1970-2000), noting which were more productive and which potentially hampered progress. Our overall conclusion is that JAP's role in this literature has not been to propose models and new ideas, but has been primarily to test ideas and models proposed elsewhere. Nonetheless, we conclude that the papers published in JAP made important contribution to the filed by addressing many of the critical questions raised by others. We also suggest several areas for future research, especially research focusing on performance management. (PsycINFO Database Record

show abstract

“…While psychological research often insists on a highly reliable measure of job performance (or for that matter, any criterion) assessed at a point in time, scant attention was paid to whether the criterion had reliability from one time-period to the next. Consequently, a body of research emerged examining the reliability of performance ratings at various time lags (e.g., Ghiselli, 1956;Prien, 1966;Rambo, Chomiak, & Price, 1983;Rambo, Chomiak, & Rountree, 1987;Rothe, 1946Rothe, , 1978Rothe & Nye, 1958, 1959, 1961.…”

Section: Evidence Of Dynamic Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

The Past, Present, and Future of Dynamic Performance Research

Sturman¹

2007

Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews the extensive history of dynamic performance research, with the goal of providing a clear picture of where the field has been, where it is now, and where it needs to go. Past research has established that job performance does indeed change, but the implications of this dynamism and the predictability of performance trends remain unresolved. Theories are available to help explain dynamic performance, and although far from providing an unambiguous understanding of the phenomenon, they offer direction for future theoretical development. Dynamic performance research does suffer from a number of methodological difficulties, but new techniques have emerged that present even more opportunities to advance knowledge in this area. From this review, I propose research questions to bridge the theoretical and methodological gaps of this area. Answering these questions can advance both research involving job performance prediction and our understanding of the effects of human resource interventions.

show abstract

Output rates among coil winders.

Cited by 20 publications

References 4 publications

A Factor Analysis of Eleven Job Performance Measures

A Factor Analysis of Eleven Job Performance Measures

Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?

The Past, Present, and Future of Dynamic Performance Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About