15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2020) 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2555602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall performance, image quality, and dose, in computed radiology (CR) mammography systems operating in the Mexican public sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commissioning QC tests and program knowledge and implementation were lowly implemented, which is likely due to the fact that administrative personnel, RDs, and RTs are not very aware of national regulations, their responsibilities, and how to carry them out. This lack of QAP/QC programs is in line with what was previously reported in Mexico [21]. In addition, the low number of MP workers indicates non-compliance with Mexican mammography regulations regarding the minimum staff of a breast-cancer detection unit [12], and the low number of MPs within the radiodiagnostic field is in accordance with García-Hernández et al's previous report [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commissioning QC tests and program knowledge and implementation were lowly implemented, which is likely due to the fact that administrative personnel, RDs, and RTs are not very aware of national regulations, their responsibilities, and how to carry them out. This lack of QAP/QC programs is in line with what was previously reported in Mexico [21]. In addition, the low number of MP workers indicates non-compliance with Mexican mammography regulations regarding the minimum staff of a breast-cancer detection unit [12], and the low number of MPs within the radiodiagnostic field is in accordance with García-Hernández et al's previous report [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 1 showed that the most frequent mammography brands observed were IMS Giotto (31.91%) and Hologic Inc. (23.40%); these brands have appeared in similar studies in Mexico during the last decade, which shows their relatively high presence in the Mexican health sector [16,20,21]. This study provides solid evidence of the low presence of QAP implementation and monitoring in the mammography facilities evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…X-ray mammography remains as the gold standard for breast cancer screening and diagnosis around the world (Karellas and Vedantham 2008). Even though developments in the field of breast imaging enabled the clinical use of digital radiography (DR) (Lewin et al 2001, Pisano et al 2005 and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) (Niklason et al 1997, Friedewald et al 2014, many countries still rely on computed radiography (CR) for breast imaging (Hong et al 2020, Barufaldi et al 2020, Brandan et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%