1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00421947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overbreak and underbreak in underground openings Part 2: causes and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overbreak is undesirable in every underground space since it increases muckpile volume so as to result in more mucking time (Ibarra et al, 1996a). Excessive contour roughness and overbreak require additional shotcrete volume or rock bolts, increasing support cost (Ibarra et al, 1996b). And also, McKown (1986) has stated that the resulting overbreak and damage to remaining rock can lead to safety problems and additional costs due to additional mucking of extra rock, extra backfill material to fill overbreak and additional rock reinforcement, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overbreak is undesirable in every underground space since it increases muckpile volume so as to result in more mucking time (Ibarra et al, 1996a). Excessive contour roughness and overbreak require additional shotcrete volume or rock bolts, increasing support cost (Ibarra et al, 1996b). And also, McKown (1986) has stated that the resulting overbreak and damage to remaining rock can lead to safety problems and additional costs due to additional mucking of extra rock, extra backfill material to fill overbreak and additional rock reinforcement, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, it is urgent to develop a valid and convenient method to predict potential danger in tunnel excavation. Jimin and Mahtab [1] obtained the sizes, shapes, and locations of overbreak blocks by structural plane geometrical characteristics in the case of underground tunnels; Jiamei et al [2] analyzed the effects of surrounding rock and support structure stability by TBM excavation from the angle of quantity; Jian and Xinjiao [3] deduced the statistical regularity of overbreak block sizes and locations in expressway tunnels; Deyun [4] proposed a calculation method of the areas of overbreak and underbreak blocks from the view of mathematics; Huibing [5] applied the drill hole blasting method to seek overbreak and underbreak block sizes and locations; Mingnian and Baoshu [6] used the self-adaption finite element method to analyze the effects of tunnel overbreak blocks on stability of surrounding rock; Revey [7] proposed a control overbreak method of mine tunnel by means of control blasting; Ibarra et al [8][9][10] proposed a light-section method to evaluate the volumes of overbreak blocks and developed the relevant equipment and calculation program; Thidemann [11], Abel [12], and Martna [13] applied numerical method to analyze the interaction of tunnel overbreak blocks and surrounding rock deformation. In fact, overbreak blocks in tunnel excavation arise from two aspects: incorrect excavation and natural structural plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soc. Malaysia, Bulletin 46 3) can be grouped into two categories (Ibarra et al, 1996); i.e. 1) the geological factors or the make up character of the ground and 2) the nature of the excavation (blasting) operation.…”
Section: Discontinuities In Blasting Excavations Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between blasting, geological conditions and overbreak and underbreak has been long discussed (e.g. Hoek and Bray, 1981;Ibarra et al, 1996 and many others), but there has been no systematic and quantitative investigation of them. The geological factors influencing overbreak and underbreak are mainly structural discontinuity planes.…”
Section: Discontinuities In Blasting Excavations Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation