2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2019.8917045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Challenges of Validation Automated Driving and Identification of Critical Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research developed an approach to conduct a passive form of real-world testing for ADS assessment. In this approach, the automated driving function is installed in an actual testing vehicle and provided with the real-world inputs of the sensors, without access to the actuators of the test vehicle, i.e., the so-called shadow mode testing [10]. The system's performance can then be evaluated based on its decisions toward real traffic situations.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research developed an approach to conduct a passive form of real-world testing for ADS assessment. In this approach, the automated driving function is installed in an actual testing vehicle and provided with the real-world inputs of the sensors, without access to the actuators of the test vehicle, i.e., the so-called shadow mode testing [10]. The system's performance can then be evaluated based on its decisions toward real traffic situations.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Winner [30] present a method, whereby the automated driving function is executed passively in series production vehicles, which is sometimes known as shadow mode. The driving function is provided with the real inputs of the sensors, but cannot access the actuators of the vehicle.…”
Section: ) Shadow Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is based on set invariance, divides the given data into separate groups, and validates each group independently. These solutions aim to improve the accuracy and reliability of critical scenario validation by providing methods for comparing scenarios to real-world data, adjusting them as needed, and evaluating the safety and security of ADS [86], [87], [88].…”
Section: Critical Scenario Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%