2014
DOI: 10.1177/0169796x14536970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming the Digital Divide in Developing Countries

Abstract: countries has been hailed as a major step toward a solution to the problem of the underdevelopment of many of them. Obstacles such as corruption, delays in service delivery, lack of public sector accountability, and so on, can, many believe, be overcome with ICT: particularly, the Internet and cell or mobile phones. Furthermore, ICT is seen as "offering an unprecedented opportunity to overcome existing social divisions and inequalities" (Selwyn 2004: 342) in all societies, and especially developing countrie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our interest for the purposes of this paper is, however, more in how embedded sociocultural and socioeconomic inequalities in the Internet directly affect heritage issues. Commonly debated within the framework of a 'digital divide' , these have been discussed elsewhere, but are worth highlighting to contextualise our discussion (Castells 2001;Van Dijk 2005;Ohemeng and Ofosu-Adarkwa 2014). Richardson (2014, 106) outlines a number of issues that upset the notion of the Internet's neutrality, noting that it can 'perpetuate social divides and generate and actively promote hierarchy and inequalities' , not least in social media.…”
Section: Key Principles: Internet Neutrality and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest for the purposes of this paper is, however, more in how embedded sociocultural and socioeconomic inequalities in the Internet directly affect heritage issues. Commonly debated within the framework of a 'digital divide' , these have been discussed elsewhere, but are worth highlighting to contextualise our discussion (Castells 2001;Van Dijk 2005;Ohemeng and Ofosu-Adarkwa 2014). Richardson (2014, 106) outlines a number of issues that upset the notion of the Internet's neutrality, noting that it can 'perpetuate social divides and generate and actively promote hierarchy and inequalities' , not least in social media.…”
Section: Key Principles: Internet Neutrality and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interface usability contextualised for farmers, service providers and developers Current views on the 'digital divide' in sub-Saharan Africa and Sierra Leone provide good reasons not to imagine any intervention using digital interfaces in rural Eastern Sierra Leone, although these same authors also imagine digital futures (Fuchs & Horal, 2006;Ohemeng & Ofusu-Adarkwa (2012);Sam, 2015). However, in the design and development of the prototype, the digital divide is not addressed from an international perspective.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there is a limited body of literature that evaluates the role of ICT and e‐government in revenue mobilization at the national and local levels. Also, some of the studies that have focused on the use of ICTs in public institutions have neglected local authorities like MMDAs (Ohemeng & Ofosu‐Darkwah, ; Osei‐Kojo, ), in spite of the inclusion of Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA) in the most recent World Bank‐funded e‐Ghana Project in 2008. There is the need for researchers to fill this void, by undertaking studies, which seek to evaluate the implementation of e‐government strategies by local institutions in Ghana.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the findings of scholars like Osei‐Kojo () were not consistent with those of Awortwi and Owusu (). In view of the urgent calls for the reduction of public spending and an increment in revenue generation capacity of MMDAs (Ohemeng & Ofosu‐Darkwah, ), the notion that e‐government enhances revenue capacity of state institutions is contentious and needs further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%