1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1996.tb01850.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overconfidence and personal evaluations of social rank

Abstract: Research on confidence judgements suggests that people are often overconfident. However, some studies have found that depressed mood reduces this positive bias. To date this has been explained as a mood phenomenon. In this study we explore an alternative theory which suggests that confidence is related to internal judgements of social rank and status. This theory suggests that the lower one perceives oneself to be in status and rank the less one can afford to be overconfident. Data from a student population su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dowling and Lucey (2010) show that ambitious settings fostering competition among individuals nurture a biased self-attribution (see also Eshraghi and Taffler, 2012;Simon and Heimer, 2015). The social ranking theory contributes by explaining in which way good performances compared with the social environment nourish the signaler's self-perception and result in higher confidence and risk taking (Gilbert et al, 1996;Baker and Nofsinger, 2002). While several studies argue that the scarcity of information in competitive fields augments overconfidence, the immediate feedback on social trading platforms can reduce biased self-attribution as true abilities are revealed (Jin et al, 2016;Heimer, 2016;Gortner and van der Weele, 2019).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dowling and Lucey (2010) show that ambitious settings fostering competition among individuals nurture a biased self-attribution (see also Eshraghi and Taffler, 2012;Simon and Heimer, 2015). The social ranking theory contributes by explaining in which way good performances compared with the social environment nourish the signaler's self-perception and result in higher confidence and risk taking (Gilbert et al, 1996;Baker and Nofsinger, 2002). While several studies argue that the scarcity of information in competitive fields augments overconfidence, the immediate feedback on social trading platforms can reduce biased self-attribution as true abilities are revealed (Jin et al, 2016;Heimer, 2016;Gortner and van der Weele, 2019).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now clear evidence that mild positive biases and optimism are associated with a variety of health measures including good mood and perseverance (Peterson, Maier & Seligman, 1993;Taylor & Brown 1988. Using evolutionary theory, however, Gilbert, Allan, Ball & Bradshaw (1996) found that confidence was related to the perceptions of social rank rather than mood. This suggests that positive biases may be sensitive to rank evaluations, and that in subsequent studies of confidence social rank estimates should be assessed.…”
Section: Positive Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaler om accept af social magt, indflydelses og statusrelationer bidrager til opretholdelsen af gruppens integritet og sammenhaengskraft. Denne sammenhaengskraft traekker gruppen på, både når der opstår indre konflikter eller aendringer, og når den håndterer ydre aendringer, krav og trusler (Gilbert, Allan, Ball & Bradshaw, 1996).…”
Section: Social Og Kollektiv Smerteadfaerdunclassified