2005
DOI: 10.1309/aqxr6b2qpugd638c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overexpression of Glutathione S-Transferase α in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: To determine its diagnostic value, we evaluated glutathione S-transferase alpha (GST-alpha) expression in a large number of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). GST-alpha messenger RNA (mRNA) levels from 70 renal neoplasms were analyzed with complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray chips containing 21,632 cDNA clones. Furthermore, 348 primary renal tumors and 24 metastatic RCCs were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis with a GST-alpha-specific antibody. GST-alpha mRNA was elevated significantly (11.4-fold) in a majo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
39
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…b Sensitivity and specificity for both markers resulted in LR+ <10 and LR->0.1 Table 2 Review of the six marker combination for each single specimen; positive staining for each marker scored +1 for the respective subtype RCC main subtypes as described in the literature, although the differences between the subtypes were occasionally not as pronounced. For example, sensitivity for GST-α and CD-10 in terms of cc-RCC was comparable to the published data [6][7][8][9][10]13]; however, a number of pp-RCC and cp-RCC tumors expressed GST-α and CD10, respectively. Consequently, specificity of these markers was affected and lower than that reported in earlier studies [7,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…b Sensitivity and specificity for both markers resulted in LR+ <10 and LR->0.1 Table 2 Review of the six marker combination for each single specimen; positive staining for each marker scored +1 for the respective subtype RCC main subtypes as described in the literature, although the differences between the subtypes were occasionally not as pronounced. For example, sensitivity for GST-α and CD-10 in terms of cc-RCC was comparable to the published data [6][7][8][9][10]13]; however, a number of pp-RCC and cp-RCC tumors expressed GST-α and CD10, respectively. Consequently, specificity of these markers was affected and lower than that reported in earlier studies [7,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, sensitivity for GST-α and CD-10 in terms of cc-RCC was comparable to the published data [6][7][8][9][10]13]; however, a number of pp-RCC and cp-RCC tumors expressed GST-α and CD10, respectively. Consequently, specificity of these markers was affected and lower than that reported in earlier studies [7,13,15]. This might be attributed to the increased number of papillary and especially chromophobe RCC tumors in our study [8-10, 14, 25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Epidemiological results show that aberrant expression of GSTa has been linked to an increased risk in colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer and clear cell renal cell carcinoma ; Tetlow et al, 2004a;Chuang et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%