2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.389040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overlay performance in advanced processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal at this thickness is around 9 to 10%, which is above the threshold value of 6% we mentioned before. This system relies on the diffraction signals from grating-like alignment marks [2]. A typical alignment process consists of pre-alignment, coarse alignment, and fme alignment stages.…”
Section: Direct Imaging Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal at this thickness is around 9 to 10%, which is above the threshold value of 6% we mentioned before. This system relies on the diffraction signals from grating-like alignment marks [2]. A typical alignment process consists of pre-alignment, coarse alignment, and fme alignment stages.…”
Section: Direct Imaging Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In phased introductions, sensor and applications improvements were validated and integrated in production environments, at various customer sites [2,7,9,10,11,13,14,16]. With the knowledge gained from joint development activities on on-product overlay, the increasing importance of synchronizing alignment mark design criteria, with alignment sensor hardware specifics was recognized [3,4,5,6]. Significant steps forward in this field were made, operating within the boundaries of the ATHENA TM sensor [4,6,8,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As reported previously, 1,4 it was designed to minimize sensitivity to process effects such as mark asymmetry and variation in mark depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%