2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overload failure curve and fatigue behavior of spot-welded specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar report by Kavamura and Batalha (2008) indicates the ratio of failure loads under pure-shear (P PS f ) and pure-tension (P CT f ) configurations as 0.811 (0.8 mm thickness) and 0.818 (1.2 mm thickness) for sheets of a mild steel of 170 MPa yield strength. The present results (Table 6) Lee et al (2005a) indicate higher values of P CT f /P TS f as 0.908 and 0.870 for weld nugget diameters of 4.95 and 5.9 mm, respectively. The above analyses show that the experimental results are closer to the theoretical predictions of P CT f /P TS f (=0.735) based on Von Mises' criterion.…”
Section: Failure Loads and Failure Stressesmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar report by Kavamura and Batalha (2008) indicates the ratio of failure loads under pure-shear (P PS f ) and pure-tension (P CT f ) configurations as 0.811 (0.8 mm thickness) and 0.818 (1.2 mm thickness) for sheets of a mild steel of 170 MPa yield strength. The present results (Table 6) Lee et al (2005a) indicate higher values of P CT f /P TS f as 0.908 and 0.870 for weld nugget diameters of 4.95 and 5.9 mm, respectively. The above analyses show that the experimental results are closer to the theoretical predictions of P CT f /P TS f (=0.735) based on Von Mises' criterion.…”
Section: Failure Loads and Failure Stressesmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…11. The observed nature of the hardness profiles are similar to the ones reported by Lee et al (2005a), Lamouroux et al (2007), Choi et al (2007) and Chang et al (2001). The base metal, HAZ and the fusion zone of the spotwelds are considered to exhibit some characteristic average hardness value; these are estimated and are compiled in Table 4.…”
Section: Hardness Profile Across the Spot-weldmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limitation of these approaches is that fracture generally involves considerations of energy in addition to considerations of strength, and, therefore, purely strength-based approaches to fracture are not expected to give geometry-independent predictions. There have also been studies that have approached the problem of weld failure from an energy-based approach, using linear-elastic fracture-mechanics (Zhang, 1997(Zhang, , 1999(Zhang, , 2001Lee et al, 2005). However, these approaches are limited to systems dominated by elasticity or small-scale yielding (small compared to the thickness of the sheet metal and to the size of the weld).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Validation of existing spot-weld failure criteria has been explored with analytical approaches wherein the stress distribution around a weld is related to the far field failure load [14,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23] and with finite element failure simulations [24,25]. There are numerous reports in the literature aimed at predicting failure of spot welds under various loading conditions such as tension [23], shear [23], combined tensile/shear [16,23,26], impact [27], and fatigue [28,29]. Test specimens with different geometries (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%