1960
DOI: 10.1149/1.2427697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overtemperature in Metal Scaling

Abstract: not Available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in air or oxygen) to the target temperatures and then held at the target temperatures isothermally. The advantage of this is that there is no rapid reaction taking place when the isothermal holding starts and therefore, there is very little over-heating caused by the sudden release of heat of formation (called overtemperature in an early study [11]). The disadvantage of this is that the oxide scale structure formed during heating would be different from that developed during isothermal holding and would possibly affect the final scale structure developed.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in air or oxygen) to the target temperatures and then held at the target temperatures isothermally. The advantage of this is that there is no rapid reaction taking place when the isothermal holding starts and therefore, there is very little over-heating caused by the sudden release of heat of formation (called overtemperature in an early study [11]). The disadvantage of this is that the oxide scale structure formed during heating would be different from that developed during isothermal holding and would possibly affect the final scale structure developed.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous experiences, 21 when a new sample was oxidized at temperatures above 1000 • C, an over-temperature phenomenon 22 would occur in the initial oxidation stage. The sample surface temperature would rise rapidly in the first 20 s of reaction, to a temperature much higher than the target temperature.…”
Section: Experimentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That this is the actual reason for the rate difference is not established; also involved might be moisture content, Cr/Fe ratio, impurities, recrystallization, or some other characteristic of the oxide film. A possibility that surface overheating could account for the difference in rate was rejected by experiments February 1961 in which the surface temperature was followed by thermocouples welded to the specimens (8).…”
Section: Surface Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%