2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview and evaluation of different nuclear level density models for the 123I radionuclide production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction pathways involved in these three methods are 121 Sb(α, 2n) 123 I, 124 Te (p, 2n) 123 I and 123 Te(p, n) 123 I. These reactions can be problematic, as it is difficult to remove one of the contaminants produced, 124 I from 123 I, due to possessing the same energy 29 . A second reaction is through the precursor xenon‐123 ( 123 Xe).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reaction pathways involved in these three methods are 121 Sb(α, 2n) 123 I, 124 Te (p, 2n) 123 I and 123 Te(p, n) 123 I. These reactions can be problematic, as it is difficult to remove one of the contaminants produced, 124 I from 123 I, due to possessing the same energy 29 . A second reaction is through the precursor xenon‐123 ( 123 Xe).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second reaction is through the precursor xenon‐123 ( 123 Xe). 127 I is bombarded producing 123 Xe which decays to 123 I via ( 127 I(p, 5n) 123 Xe → 123 I) 29 . The advantage of the second reaction is that the xenon can be separated from the primary target material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%