Flavonoids have long been recognized for their general health-promoting properties, of which their antioxidant activity may play an important role. In this work we have studied the properties of two flavonols, quercetin and myricetin, using semi-empirical methods in order to validate the application of the recent Parametric Model 6 and to understand the fundamental difference between the two molecules. Their geometries have been optimized and important molecular properties have been calculated. The energetic of the possible antioxidant mechanisms have also been analyzed. The two studied flavonols do not differ significantly in their molecular properties, but the antioxidant mechanisms by which they may act in solution can be rather different. Moreover, we also show that the Parametric Model 6 can produce reliable information for this type of compounds.Response to Reviewers: Reviewer #1: P.3 "Q" and "M" are used before they are defined. P.5 "Q" and "M" definitions should be given earlier in the paper. P.5 "... what is of extreme." should be ". which is of extreme ." P. 7 HAT has already been defined on p.2, BDE has already been defined. P.4 ". can be stabilized more effectively stabilized ." is very bad English »»» These issues have been properly adressed.P.5 ". determining the biological relevance of these compounds." Does not follow from the preceding part of the sentence. »»» It was an oversimplification of what was meant. We changed it to "indicating that they will be available to interact with surrounding radicals and other species" (pages 5/6).P.8 The statement, "As it can be seen from Table 6, the absolute values obtained are strikingly different from those obtained by other authors at the DFT level." is utterly useless unless the DFT results are also presented. Do the authors intend the reader to stop, search for suitable DFT publications, do the comparison, and then resume reading? »»» We have now included these results in the tables and made the necessary comparisons. Table 6 was split in two - Table 6 for M and Table 7 for Q -and now contain the DFT acidities and BDE values retrieved from the literature. We have also included a new table -Table 8 -which contains the deprotonation and H atom abstraction orders from the literature as well as from our work.P.8 For the authors to say that ". the calculated heats of formation of H+ and H*, that need to be further refined." is meaningless. They can say that PM6 gives very inaccurate values for these quantities. The implication that further refinement would give better values is not supported by any evidence. »»» As a consequence of this remark, as well as of the remarks of the Reviewer #2, we have repeated the calculations using the same method but under much more stringent conditions and also using other methods. These new calculations led to heats of formation of H* and H+ of, respectively, 217.99 (which is the accepted reference value, a parameter in the program) and 1303.16 kJ/mol, which differs about 15 % from the accepted reference value of 1...