2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0363-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges: methodologies and recommendations for practice

Abstract: BackgroundMany medicines are dosed to achieve a particular therapeutic range, and monitored using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The evidence base for a therapeutic range can be evaluated using systematic reviews, to ensure it continues to reflect current indications, doses, routes and formulations, as well as updated adverse effect data. There is no consensus on the optimal methodology for systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges.MethodsAn overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges was undertake… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that regard, the optimal efficacy of a drug at the infected site is when the drug concentration measured over a period of time lies within a certain therapeutic range [18], [19]. The therapeutic range of a drug is the range in which the drugs are usually expected to achieve efficacy [20] with the lower and upper boundary called as the least effective concentration (LEC) and the maximum effective concentration (MEC), respectively. When an MC-based TDD is used for drug delivery, the drugrelease task is such that each nanomachine will release some amount of drug and a cumulative concentration of the drug is anticipated at the infected site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that regard, the optimal efficacy of a drug at the infected site is when the drug concentration measured over a period of time lies within a certain therapeutic range [18], [19]. The therapeutic range of a drug is the range in which the drugs are usually expected to achieve efficacy [20] with the lower and upper boundary called as the least effective concentration (LEC) and the maximum effective concentration (MEC), respectively. When an MC-based TDD is used for drug delivery, the drugrelease task is such that each nanomachine will release some amount of drug and a cumulative concentration of the drug is anticipated at the infected site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available quality assessment tools do not specifically address drug concentration-effect studies [16], thus criteria for quality assessment were adapted from a previously published meta-analysis of Ulrich et al concerning the concentration-therapeutic effect relationship of haloperidol in adults [17]. As the current systematic review covers different types of psychotropic drugs with a broad range of indications, not all criteria of the total score as used by Ulrich et al were applicable.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Therapeutic Drug Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies failed to perform standardized sampling, including sampling with respect to steady state and administration time. Therefore, there is a need for an accepted tool for the appraisal of drug concentration-effect studies [10,16]. The assessment criteria proposed by this report could serve as a starting point, hopefully reducing the heterogeneity observed to date, and permitting meta-analyses.…”
Section: Research Recommendations To Support Tdm In Childand Adolescementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concern about these values is due to the fact that the recommended dose is 1 to 2 g of the herbal product 2 to 3 times a day [34]. Ingesting a greater amount can cause a dose higher than the therapeutic range established for it (dosage range, or blood plasma or serum concentration usually expected to achieve the desired therapeutic effect) [41]. This can cause the side effects appearance [42].…”
Section: Table-3: Labeling Percentage Of the Analyzed Samples Of Eachmentioning
confidence: 99%