Purpose: To quantify morphologic photoreceptor integrity during anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and correlate these findings with disease morphology and function. Methods: This presents a post hoc analysis on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography data of 185 patients, acquired at baseline, Month 3, and Month 12 in a multicenter, prospective trial. Loss of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was manually quantified in all optical coherence tomography volumes. Intraretinal cystoid fluid, subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachments were automatically segmented in the full volumes using validated deep learning methods. Spatiotemporal correlation of fluid markers with EZ integrity as well as bivariate analysis between EZ integrity and best-corrected visual acuity was performed. Results: At baseline, EZ integrity was predominantly impaired in the fovea, showing progressive recovery during anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Topographic analysis at baseline revealed EZ integrity to be more likely intact in areas with SRF and vice versa. Moreover, we observed a correlation between EZ integrity and resolution of SRF. Foveal EZ integrity correlated with best-corrected visual acuity at all timepoints. Conclusion: Improvement of EZ integrity during anti-VEGF therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration occurred predominantly in the fovea. Photoreceptor integrity correlated with best-corrected visual acuity. Ellipsoid zone integrity was preserved in areas of SRF and showed deterioration upon SRF resolution.

No abstract

BackgroundMany medicines are dosed to achieve a particular therapeutic range, and monitored using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The evidence base for a therapeutic range can be evaluated using systematic reviews, to ensure it continues to reflect current indications, doses, routes and formulations, as well as updated adverse effect data. There is no consensus on the optimal methodology for systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges.MethodsAn overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges was undertaken. The following databases were used: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effects (DARE) and MEDLINE. The published methodologies used when systematically reviewing the therapeutic range of a drug were analyzed. Step by step recommendations to optimize such systematic reviews are proposed.ResultsTen systematic reviews that investigated the correlation between serum concentrations and clinical outcomes encompassing a variety of medicines and indications were assessed. There were significant variations in the methodologies used (including the search terms used, data extraction methods, assessment of bias, and statistical analyses undertaken). Therapeutic ranges should be population and indication specific and based on clinically relevant outcomes. Recommendations for future systematic reviews based on these findings have been developed.ConclusionEvidence based therapeutic ranges have the potential to improve TDM practice. Current systematic reviews investigating therapeutic ranges have highly variable methodologies and there is no consensus of best practice when undertaking systematic reviews in this field. These recommendations meet a need not addressed by standard protocols.

BackgroundIntravenous theophyllines are a second line treatment for children suffering an acute exacerbation of asthma. Various guidelines and formularies recommend aiming for serum theophylline levels between 10-20mg/l. This review aims to assess the evidence underpinning this recommendation.MethodsA systematic review comparing outcomes of children who achieved serum theophylline concentrations between 10-20mg/l with those who did not. Primary outcomes were time until resolution of symptoms, mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were date until discharge criteria are met, actual discharge, adverse effects and FEV1.Data sourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Web of Science. Search performed in October 2015.Eligibility criteriaInterventional or observational studies utilizing intravenous theophyllines for an acute exacerbation of asthma in children where serum theophylline levels and clinical outcomes were measured.Findings10 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. Children with serum levels between 10-20mg/l did not have a reduction in duration of symptoms, length of hospital stay or need for mechanical ventilation or better spirometric results compared with levels <10mg/l. Levels above 20mg/l are not associated with higher rates of adverse effects. This study is limited due to heterogeneity in the way theophylline levels were reported and poor surveillance of adverse effects across studies.ConclusionDosing strategies aiming for levels between 10-20mg/l are not associated with better outcomes. Clinicians should rely on clinical outcomes and not serum levels when using intravenous theophyllines in children suffering an acute exacerbation of asthma.

BackgroundAdequate asthma treatment of childhood exacerbations with IV aminophylline depends on appropriate dosage. Recommendations to aim for a target therapeutic range may be inappropriate as serum concentrations correlate poorly with clinical improvement. This review aims to evaluate the evidence for the optimum dosage strategy of intravenous aminophylline in children suffering an exacerbation of asthma.MethodsA systematic review comparing dosage regimens of intravenous aminophylline in children suffering an exacerbation of asthma. Primary outcomes were time until resolution of symptoms, mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were date until discharge criteria are met, actual discharge and adverse effects.Data sourcesCENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Search performed in March 2016Eligibility criteriaStudies using intravenous aminophylline in children with an acute exacerbation of asthma which reported the dosage and clinical outcomes.Findings14 RCTs were included. There is a poor relationship between the dosage administered to children and symptom resolution, length of stay or need for mechanical ventilation. This study is limited due to its use of indirect evidence.ConclusionThe currently recommended dosage regimens may not represent the optimum safety and efficacy of intravenous aminophylline. There is a need to develop the evidence base correlating dosage with patient centered clinical outcomes, to improve prescribing practices.