2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovum pick-up interval in buffalo ( Bubalus bubalis ) managed under wetland conditions in Argentina: Effect on follicular population, oocyte recovery, and in vitro embryo development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 2 Table 3, there was no difference in oocyte recovery rate between once and twice OPU session groups. Percentage of grade 2-4 between once and twice a week OPU session (Konrad et al, 2017) and optimal OPU interval has not been determined due to different feeding system, condition of donor cow, and different OPU system. On the other hand, collection of high quality and high number of oocytes by using OPU will produce high quality blastocyst production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 2 Table 3, there was no difference in oocyte recovery rate between once and twice OPU session groups. Percentage of grade 2-4 between once and twice a week OPU session (Konrad et al, 2017) and optimal OPU interval has not been determined due to different feeding system, condition of donor cow, and different OPU system. On the other hand, collection of high quality and high number of oocytes by using OPU will produce high quality blastocyst production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result means that, recovery periods for three months was effective for oocyte collection by using OPU compared with two months of recovery period after donor cow. Previous reports have been focused only on the times an OPU session can be repeatedly done from donor cow and the change in the number of collected oocytes for long periods (Konrad et al, 2017). Kruip et al (1994) reported that the collected number of oocytes were similar between two and five months of OPU experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency at which OPU sessions are performed could affect the number of follicles available for aspiration (Ferraz et al, 2015). For example, Konrad et al (2017) observed that 14-day intervals between OPU sessions would increase the amount of recovered oocytes (4.5 ± 0.49/animal) compared to 7-day intervals (2.8 ± 0.45/animal). However, in the aspirations performed every 14 days, the availability of good quality oocytes decreases, therefore generally speaking the frequency of aspirations could affect the oocyte recovery rate, but would not modify the final blastocyst production rate (Konrad et al, 2017).…”
Section: Cumulus-oocyte Complex (Cocs) From Live Donorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are significant differences between B. indicus and Bos taurus cows with regard to their reproductive physiology, as B. indicus cattle have a longer prepubertal period, poor estrus expression, reduced diameter of DF and CL, and fewer overt signs of estrus. Previously, many studies have been conducted to optimize the OPU frequency in bovines but most of the studies were either on B. taurus and compared just OW and TW OPU intervals (Gibbons et al, 1994;Lopes et al, 2006;Merton et al, 2003) or on the stage of estrous cycle in cattle (Hendriksen et al, 2004;Petyim et al, 2003) or studied the different OPU intervals in the buffalo (Ferraz et al, 2015;Konrad et al, 2017;Neglia et al, 2011) and their findings are contradictory. The information regarding optimization of OPU intervals, especially in terms of follicular dynamics and gene expression, is lacking in B. indicus cattle in general and in Sahiwal cattle in particular, which needs to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure also allows follicles with diameter >2 mm to be visualized and aspirated, thereby resetting the estrous cycle and avoiding dominance of one follicle over its subordinates (Neglia et al, 2011). The outcome of OPU‐based IVEP, in terms of follicle population, oocyte recovery rate, oocyte quality and their development to morula‐blastocyst stages, is influenced by nutrition (Sartori et al, 2017), body condition score (BCS) (Dorice et al, 2019), stage of the estrous cycle (Hendriksen et al, 2004), lactation status (Baruselli et al, 2018), pregnancy status (Ratto et al, 2011), parity (Jin et al, 2016), season of the year in which OPU is carried out (Di Francesco et al, 2012) and OPU interval between consecutive OPU sessions (Konrad et al, 2017). For cattle, strategies to enhance the ovarian follicular population, the percentage of non‐atretic follicles and the COCs quality are essential for improving OPU‐IVEP efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%