2014
DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Owner-Management, Firm Age, and Productivity in Italian Family Firms

Abstract: Using total factor productivity as a measure of corporate performance, we find that Italian family‐run firms are less productive than firms run by outside managers and the result is robust to potential endogeneity of management regime. This difference tends to vanish when the age of the firms is taken into account. Also, when considering family‐owned firms only, there is no difference in performance between outside managers and family managers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
71
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
9
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction is rooted in established agency arguments suggesting that labor productivity is at least partially a function of both moral hazards, such as misaligned interests between owners and managers, and adverse selection, such as from hiring from a suboptimal talent pool (Akerlof, 1970;Eisenhardt, 1989;Jensen & Meckling, 1976). In conjunction with recent arguments from the family business (Chrisman et al, 2017;Cucculelli, Mannarino, Pupo, & Ricotta, 2014) and finance (Barth et al, 2005;Burkart, Panunzi, & Shleifer, 2003) literatures, we suggest that these problems are particularly severe in family firms. Moral hazards are rampant given the diverging interests of family owners and their nonfamily employees (Chua, Chrisman, & Bergiel, 2009;Schulze et al, 2001).…”
Section: Labor Productivitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This prediction is rooted in established agency arguments suggesting that labor productivity is at least partially a function of both moral hazards, such as misaligned interests between owners and managers, and adverse selection, such as from hiring from a suboptimal talent pool (Akerlof, 1970;Eisenhardt, 1989;Jensen & Meckling, 1976). In conjunction with recent arguments from the family business (Chrisman et al, 2017;Cucculelli, Mannarino, Pupo, & Ricotta, 2014) and finance (Barth et al, 2005;Burkart, Panunzi, & Shleifer, 2003) literatures, we suggest that these problems are particularly severe in family firms. Moral hazards are rampant given the diverging interests of family owners and their nonfamily employees (Chua, Chrisman, & Bergiel, 2009;Schulze et al, 2001).…”
Section: Labor Productivitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The reason why the family firm is the center of our model is because of its unique characteristics (i.e., firm familiness [Habbershon & Williams, 1999]) that alter the way it is governed and managed. Even more, because of the effect of the family on the firm, firm objectives and incentives are altered, causing family firms use, create, and allocate resources in different ways than non-family firms do (Cucculelli, Mannarino, Pupo, & Ricotta, 2014). Under this premise, we argue that the embeddedness of family businesses in regional economic structures influences the regional economy.…”
Section: Interdependence Gap Between Family Business and Regional Ecomentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Results show that firms in the supplier dominated sector and small firms have, ceteris paribus, a lower TFP while firms located in Northern Italy exhibit higher productivity, as already stressed by the literature (Aiello et al, 2014, Ascari and Di Cosmo, 2005, Byrne et al, 2009). Moveover, as expected, family firms are less efficient Marchionne, 2012 andCucculelli et al, 2014), TFP is positively affected by labour quality (Ascari and Di Cosmo, 2005;Ciccone, 2004) while intangible assets have no significant effect. As regards the specific variable of interest, we find that research carried out by 9 Cost of labour per employee should be correlated with skill intensity if more skilled workers receive higher wages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%