2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen Kinetic Isotope Effects in the Thermal Decomposition and Reduction of Ammonium Diuranate

Abstract: Oxygen stable isotopes in uranium oxides processed through the nuclear fuel cycle may have the potential to provide information about a material’s origin and processing history. However, a more thorough understanding of the fractionating processes governing the formation of signatures in real-world samples is still needed. In this study, laboratory synthesis of uranium oxides modeled after industrial nuclear fuel fabrication was performed to follow the isotope fractionation during thermal decomposition and red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by previous work showing the calcination of the same ADU to result in a preferential loss of 16 O under an inert atmosphere using the same heating rate and ultimate temperaturein which case the δ 18 O value of U 3 O 8 was −0.7‰. 2 Interestingly, fractionation factors between each of the resulting U 3 O 8 compounds and the water vapor sources were different, with U 3 O 8 _d having Δ 18 O = −17.1‰ and U 3 O 8 _e having Δ 18 O = −7.9‰. A re-examination of the calcination procedures revealed a difference in methods; namely, termination of the calcination of U 3 O 8 _d was performed with water vapor still present using a slow cooling rate (see Figure S2) while the calcination of U 3 O 8 _e was ended by switching the atmosphere to dry N 2 prior to a fast cool-down.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is supported by previous work showing the calcination of the same ADU to result in a preferential loss of 16 O under an inert atmosphere using the same heating rate and ultimate temperaturein which case the δ 18 O value of U 3 O 8 was −0.7‰. 2 Interestingly, fractionation factors between each of the resulting U 3 O 8 compounds and the water vapor sources were different, with U 3 O 8 _d having Δ 18 O = −17.1‰ and U 3 O 8 _e having Δ 18 O = −7.9‰. A re-examination of the calcination procedures revealed a difference in methods; namely, termination of the calcination of U 3 O 8 _d was performed with water vapor still present using a slow cooling rate (see Figure S2) while the calcination of U 3 O 8 _e was ended by switching the atmosphere to dry N 2 prior to a fast cool-down.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The precipitation and structural characterization of ADU have been previously reported. 2 Briefly, ammonia was introduced into a 0.1 mol•L −1 solution of uranyl nitrate (δ 18 O water = −15.6‰) at 65 °C until a pH of 7.5 was attained. After a 30-min settling period, the precipitate was filtered and washed with deionized water.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations