2018
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygenator performance and artificial-native lung interaction

Abstract: During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), oxygen (O) transfer (V'O) and carbon dioxide (CO) removal (V'CO) are partitioned between the native lung (NL) and the membrane lung (ML), related to the patient's metabolic-hemodynamic pattern. The ML could be assimilated to a NL both in a physiological and a pathological way. ML O transfer (V'OML) is proportional to extracorporeal blood flow and the difference in O content between each ML side, while ML CO removal (V'COML) can be calculated from ML gas flow a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Evaluation of the ML performance is of paramount importance during ECMO, not only because it might indicate a gradual or sudden functional impairment and therefore the need and timing for ML replacement due to clot formation inside the oxygenator, but may also provide information regarding both the native lung (NL) and the ML contribution to the global ventilation, hence guiding the weaning process. 4 Furthermore, as for NL, ML performance is assessed by measuring both O 2 transfer through the ML (V′O 2 ML) and CO 2 removal (V′CO 2 ML) through the oxygenator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Evaluation of the ML performance is of paramount importance during ECMO, not only because it might indicate a gradual or sudden functional impairment and therefore the need and timing for ML replacement due to clot formation inside the oxygenator, but may also provide information regarding both the native lung (NL) and the ML contribution to the global ventilation, hence guiding the weaning process. 4 Furthermore, as for NL, ML performance is assessed by measuring both O 2 transfer through the ML (V′O 2 ML) and CO 2 removal (V′CO 2 ML) through the oxygenator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [CO 2 ] ML.e is the concentration at ML sweep gas outlet. 8 At flow rates at which ECCO 2 R operates, with a sufficiently large and efficient membrane, there is maximal CO 2 extraction with minimal sweep GF, VCO 2.ML therefore becomes dependent on ECBF. 9 Therefore, the resultant PaCO 2 of the patient will mainly be determined by sweep GF on VV-ECMO and by ECBF on ECCO 2 R.…”
Section: Vo 2ml ¼ Ecbf â (C Post-ml O 2 -C Pre-ml O 2 )mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis can precipitate systemic coagulopathy or hemolysis, while clot deposition can obstruct blood flow [ 6 , 7 ]. Additionally, moisture buildup in the gas phase and protein and cellular debris accumulation in the blood phase may contribute to shunt and dead-space physiology, respectively, impairing gas exchange [ 8 , 9 ]. These three categories—hematologic abnormalities, mechanical obstruction, and inadequate gas exchange—prompt the majority of ML exchanges.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Membrane Lung Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%