2007
DOI: 10.4310/jsg.2007.v5.n4.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozsváth-Szabó invariants and tight contact 3-manifolds, III

Abstract: We characterize L -spaces which are Seifert fibered over the 2-sphere in terms of taut foliations, transverse foliations and transverse contact structures. We give a sufficient condition for certain contact Seifert fibered 3-manifolds with e 0 = −1 to have nonzero contact Ozsváth-Szabó invariants. This yields an algorithm for deciding whether a given small Seifert fibered L -space carries a contact structure with nonvanishing contact Ozsváth-Szabó invariant. As an application, we prove the existence of tight c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…now [17,Section 5]). In contrast, for the non-loose knots L(n) of the previous subsection (also having non-trivial L-invariants) the same intuitive argument does not work, since some negative surgery on the knot L(n) will produce a contact structure on the 3-manifold S 3 2n−1 (T (2,2n+1) ) and since this 3-manifold does not admit any tight contact structure [24], the result of the surgery will be overtwisted independently of the chosen stabilizations. Nevertheless, the overtwisted disk in the 3-manifold obtained by only negative stabilizations cannot be in the complement of the knot L(n), since such stabilizations are still non-loose (shown by the non-vanishing of the invariant L(L(n))).…”
Section: Abcd P Qcd Axy D Ablm P Qlmmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…now [17,Section 5]). In contrast, for the non-loose knots L(n) of the previous subsection (also having non-trivial L-invariants) the same intuitive argument does not work, since some negative surgery on the knot L(n) will produce a contact structure on the 3-manifold S 3 2n−1 (T (2,2n+1) ) and since this 3-manifold does not admit any tight contact structure [24], the result of the surgery will be overtwisted independently of the chosen stabilizations. Nevertheless, the overtwisted disk in the 3-manifold obtained by only negative stabilizations cannot be in the complement of the knot L(n), since such stabilizations are still non-loose (shown by the non-vanishing of the invariant L(L(n))).…”
Section: Abcd P Qcd Axy D Ablm P Qlmmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As is explained in [25,Section 6], the Legendrian link underlying the surgery diagram for ξ n (together with the Legendrian knot L(n)) can be put on a page of an open book decomposition with planar pages, which is compatible with the standard contact structure ξ st on S 3 . This can be seen by considering the annular open book decomposition containing the Legendrian unknot (and its Legendrian push-offs), and then applying the stabilization method described in [11] for the stabilized knots.…”
Section: -Handle Attachments To Smentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Then ℓ consists of only d * i segments, i ∈ Z. It is straightforward to see (for example, by considering the segments as drawn in [HW15, Figure 1 of [LS07], we see that M (−1; 1/p 1 , . .…”
Section: Dehn Surgery and Cable Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y / (defined up to sign for the theory with ‫ޚ‬ coefficients). Since non-vanishing of c. / implies that is tight, this invariant gives a powerful tool for establishing the tightness of a contact structure (see Lisca and Stipsicz [5;6;7]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%