2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P-wave velocity structure in the northern part of the central Japan Basin, Japan Sea with ocean bottom seismometers and airguns

Abstract: In 1996, an airgun-ocean bottom seismometer survey was carried out in the northern part of the central Japan Basin. The crustal thickness in the central part is about 9 km, including a sedimentary layer with thickness of 1.5 km, and increases eastward. The obtained crustal structure is slightly different from those of typical ocean basins. The thickness and velocity of less than 6.5 km/s in the upper part of the crust do not correspond to that of a typical oceanic crust and the clear linear geomagnetic anomaly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Crustal velocities and crustal thicknesses differ somewhat (average is 13 km and 15 km, respectively), but are within estimated error. Although crustal thickness may vary from 10 km [ Sato et al , 2004] to more than 20 km [ Kurashimo et al , 1996] across the Sea of Japan, by setting the starting Moho depth to 20 km we are able to estimate mantle velocities reliably and recover crustal velocities and thicknesses to within estimated errors. Further discussion of crustal thickness beneath the Sea of Japan is presented in section 6.2, which describes the observed anticorrelation between crustal thickness and seafloor depth and provides further support for the argument that crustal thickness is relatively well determined beneath the area.…”
Section: Construction Of the 3‐d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal velocities and crustal thicknesses differ somewhat (average is 13 km and 15 km, respectively), but are within estimated error. Although crustal thickness may vary from 10 km [ Sato et al , 2004] to more than 20 km [ Kurashimo et al , 1996] across the Sea of Japan, by setting the starting Moho depth to 20 km we are able to estimate mantle velocities reliably and recover crustal velocities and thicknesses to within estimated errors. Further discussion of crustal thickness beneath the Sea of Japan is presented in section 6.2, which describes the observed anticorrelation between crustal thickness and seafloor depth and provides further support for the argument that crustal thickness is relatively well determined beneath the area.…”
Section: Construction Of the 3‐d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В 1990 и 1996 гг. выполнено два сейсмических эксперимента ГСЗ (Hirata et al, 1992;Sato et al, 2004). В последующие годы были продолжены комплексные исследования возвышенностей Первенца, Богорова, Витязя, проведены профильные и площадные геофизические исследования Центральной котловины в пределах экономической зоны России (Дальневосточные …, 2007; Зимин, 2002; Кулинич, Валитов, 2011).…”
Section: история геолого-геофизических исследованийunclassified
“…В 1996 г. в совместной российско-японской экспедиции сотрудниками ТОИ ДВО РА Н и у ниверситета г. Чиба, в 18-м рейсе НИС «Профессор Гагари нск и й», юж нее возвышенности Тарасова отработан профиль ГСЗ № 3 (J96_3) (Sato et al, 2004). На этом профиле были получены качественные материалы, позволившие получить надежные скоростные модели земной коры для Центральной котловины.…”
Section: история геолого-геофизических исследованийunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations