2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(07)70854-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P1013 Detection and characterisation of ESBLs in German Escherichia coli, isolated from animal, foods, and human origin between 2001–2006

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalences of ESBL-producing E. coli-positive fecal samples on mixed farms were 39.6% and 18.9% on beef cattle farms. This seems to be an increase, as such strains have only sporadically been described in Germany before (16). However, this could also be due to differences in the detection methods as in this study ESBLproducing E. coli strains were selected using enrichment and selective media (MCA containing cefotaxime).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalences of ESBL-producing E. coli-positive fecal samples on mixed farms were 39.6% and 18.9% on beef cattle farms. This seems to be an increase, as such strains have only sporadically been described in Germany before (16). However, this could also be due to differences in the detection methods as in this study ESBLproducing E. coli strains were selected using enrichment and selective media (MCA containing cefotaxime).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, this could also be due to differences in the detection methods as in this study ESBLproducing E. coli strains were selected using enrichment and selective media (MCA containing cefotaxime). Guerra et al (16), however, did not test samples from field trials, but received E. coli isolates from different labs wanting them to be typed. These isolates have not been selected with special media, which has an important effect on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…➀ Because antibiotic-resistant bacteria, including opportunistic pathogens mainly cause harmful effects by unexpectedly rapid proliferation under antibiotic treatment 5) rather than through the production of a specific toxin, a primer for producing gene of a specific toxin was not suitable to evaluate their risk; ➁ Because resistance to antibiotics can arise from mutations in the bacterial genome or through the acquisition of genes coding for resistance, 5) which only induce negligible variation in whole bacterial DNA, 1,29) taxonomical difference was not suitable to discriminate resistant bacteria from susceptible bacteria; ➂ Because there exist various mechanisms for acquired resistance, 30) a primer for a specific resistant gene could not cover whole resistant bacteria but could be used for certain resistant bacteria. 31) The method presented here was found to be effective and useful for the purpose of monitoring whole antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment and to evaluate their risk. A more convenient and secure method by which types of bacteria and their numbers can be identified and enumerated by the combined use of a most provable number method (MPN) and a MERFLP method without isolating bacteria have already been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We have detected ESBL-producing E. coli in livestock (5% of the animals tested). In Europe such strains have been only sporadically described in cattle: in Germany (Guerra et al, 2007 ), England (Horton et al, 2011 ), and Spain (Brinas et al, 2005 ). To our best knowledge this is the second report of ESBL-producing E. coli in cattle in France where Meunier et al ( 2006 ) reported three isolates (carrying either CTX-M-1 or CTX-M-15 ESBL) responsible for infections in cow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%