2001
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P1198: Software for tracing decision behavior in lending to small businesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IDM provides an opportunity to track the whole process of decision making, including problem recognition, information search and the purchase decision itself. By analysing amount, content and sequence of information search, decision‐making processes become transparent, and the relative weight of product attributes for the purchase decision as well as patterns of information search can be identified (Bettman and Zins, 1977; Andersson, 2001; Jasper and Shapiro, 2002).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDM provides an opportunity to track the whole process of decision making, including problem recognition, information search and the purchase decision itself. By analysing amount, content and sequence of information search, decision‐making processes become transparent, and the relative weight of product attributes for the purchase decision as well as patterns of information search can be identified (Bettman and Zins, 1977; Andersson, 2001; Jasper and Shapiro, 2002).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDM offers the possibility of tracking the whole process of decision making, including problem recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, and the purchase decision itself. The analysis of amount, content and sequence of information search helps to understand decision making processes, allows to make out patterns of information search and to identify the relative weight of product attributes for the purchase decision (Anderson, 2001;Jasper & Shapiro, 2002;Bettman & Zins, 1977).…”
Section: Information-display-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of studies on this method, and the number using it, has remained small albeit steady since this period. In the recent past, the IDM has been utilized in a series of studies published after 2000 (e.g., Andersson, 2004; Huneke, Cole, & Levin, 2004; Newell, Weston, & Shanks, 2003; Weenig & Maarleveld, 2002), while it has been developed further by some (e.g., Anderson, 2001; Jasper & Shapiro, 2002; Johnson & Willemsen, 2004). One barrier to the more widespread use of the method, especially for applied research, might be that it has been criticized sharply with respect to the external validity of results, by reason that the information acquisition context is regarded as too artificial (Kroeber-Riel & Weinberg, 2003, p. 286).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%