P13.07 Which elements of a novel self-directed rapid asymptomatic sexually transmitted infection screening service are most important to users?:

Chislett, Leigh; Clarke, J

doi:10.1136/sextrans-2015-052270.505

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The searches yielded 15 004 records after de‐duplication; after full‐text review, 368 studies were included in the overall systematic review (Figure ). Of the 368 studies, 130 are described in this paper, exploring interventions and feasibility of HIV testing in health care settings in Europe, including 84 peer‐reviewed articles and 46 conference proceedings (Table ) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Despite the availability of HIV testing guidelines to facilitate prompt diagnosis, late HIV diagnosis remains high across Europe. The study synthesizes recent evidence on HIV testing strategies adopted in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA). Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and systematic searches were run in five databases (2010–2017) to identify studies describing HIV testing interventions in health care settings in the EU/EEA. The grey literature was searched for unpublished studies (2014–2017). Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. Results One hundred and thirty intervention and/or feasibility studies on HIV testing in health care settings were identified. Interventions included testing provision (n = 94), campaigns (n = 14) and education and training for staff and patients (n = 20). HIV test coverage achieved through testing provision varied: 2.9–94% in primary care compared to 3.9–66% in emergency departments. HIV test positivity was lower in emergency departments (0–1.3%) and antenatal services (0–0.05%) than in other hospital departments (e.g. inpatients: 0–5.3%). Indicator condition testing programmes increased HIV test coverage from 3.9–72% before to 12–85% after their implementation, with most studies reporting a 10–20% increase. There were 51 feasibility and/or acceptability studies that demonstrated that HIV testing interventions were generally acceptable to patients and providers in health care settings (e.g. general practitioner testing acceptable: 77–93%). Conclusions This review has identified several strategies that could be adopted to achieve high HIV testing coverage across a variety of health care settings and populations in the EU/EEA. Very few studies compared the intervention under investigation to a baseline, but, where this was assessed, data suggested increases in testing.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This can increase testing uptake, improve partner notification rates and enable better and timelier clinician decisions, improving outcomes such as fewer unnecessary treatments and reduced PID risk. [10][11][12][13] Patients prefer rapid STI testing [14][15][16] and are happy to wait at clinic for results. Rapid testing can reduce anxiety 17 18 and improve patient acceptability of services and uptake of testing.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service.DesignA theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis.SettingA sexual health centre in Bristol, UK.Participants26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted.ResultsImplementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small ‘pilots’ of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship.ConclusionsThe new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale.

show abstract

P13.07 Which elements of a novel self-directed rapid asymptomatic sexually transmitted infection screening service are most important to users?:

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review

HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review

What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About