This paper describes the evaluation of 'gimme 5 minutes' a multimedia HIV testing campaign aimed at gay and bisexual men in London particularly targeting those of Black and South European Origin and those under the age of 25 years old using peer images. The text linked a summary of the key issues of a pre-test discussion with detailed information on how to access testing at a specified testing centre (campaign clinic). The number and demographics of men who reported sex with men (MSM) testing at the campaign clinic were monitored and compared with those testing at two other central London clinics. There was a 4.5-fold rise (p < 0.001) in MSM testing at the campaign clinic. Increases were proportionately greater in the sub-populations targeted with peer images: South European origin, 14-fold rise (p < 0.001), Black origin, 6.5-fold rise (p = 0.003), and MSM under 25 years old, 9.5-fold rise (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the number of MSM testing for HIV at the two other central London clinics studied. The results suggest that including detailed information about accessing testing services may be a vital ingredient in the success of media campaigns focusing on HIV testing.

Objectives: To identify the sexual health needs of young people in order to establish a service suited to these needs. Methods: A peer designed questionnaire piloted to a small group of young people was followed by a more widely distributed, amended questionnaire. The questionnaire survey was delivered to 744 pupils aged 11-18 years in six secondary schools and a pupil exclusion unit in central London. Factors encouraging or discouraging the use of young people's sexual health services were measured. Results: Several findings challenged existing models of care for young people's sexual health services. Notably, pupils wanted clinics to run more frequently than the usual once a week; the staff attributes that were most important were attitudinal rather than to do with sex, age, or physical appearance; and they did not mind if the waiting room contained older people. Many findings, however, agreed with existing data-young people wanted the clinic to be open after school; girls preferred to attend with a friend; a confidential, walk-in service was preferred. Conclusions: Large financial outlays are not necessary for the establishment of effective sexual health services for young people. Existing facilities and staff may be utilised with training of these staff to be sensitive to, and aware of, the needs of young people. Clinic opening times should coincide with school closing times. Although pupils stated a preference for female staff, this was not a high priority. More important was feeling that staff would listen to them and take their problems seriously, and that confidentiality would be maintained.

invited by reception staff to leave the clinic until they were sent another text when they were due to be seen. Patients in possession of a Smartphone could refresh a link to check their place in the queue at any time. IR1s and patient feedback were assessed before and after implementation Results Average no of symptomatic patients seen over a weekend was 70 with an average wait time of 89 min. In the 4 month period prior to the software implementation there were 6 IR1 forms received from staff about patient aggression. In the 4 month period after its introduction there were none. Two months post its introduction the average number of patient complaints about waiting times received was 1 from an average of 4 prior to its use. Conclusion The introduction of the queuing software has been an inexpensive and effective method of reducing complaints about patient waiting times and improving patient satisfaction with the service.

Bohr theory is employed to compute the ’’crucial depression’’ in kinetic energy for H2 when bonding occurs.

ABCD National Research Partnership, this project aimed to develop an audit tool to be used within a continuous quality improvement approach to enhance adherence to best-practice guidelines and improve the quality of Indigenous primary sexual health services. Methods The process of development of the tool involved engagement of a range of stakeholders including clinical experts, quality improvement practitioners and researchers; identification and review of best practice guidelines; development of key indicators that reflect quality of care; generation of audit items and questions; and construction of the tool, protocol and report. The tool was piloted in Western Australia, Northern Territory, Queensland and South Australia. Results The sexual health tool includes indicators that cover the basic elements of sexual health care including risk assessment, investigations, treatment, contact tracing and follow up. The protocol guides the use of the tool and the tailored report assists in identification of gaps, goal setting and planning of actions for improvement. Important elements of tool development are broad end user engagement, multidisciplinary and multi-jurisdictional consultation, effective leadership, sufficient resources and consensus building around selection of key elements of sexual health care. Conclusion The tool, which reflects the best practice for Indigenous primary sexual healthcare, is now available to Indigenous primary health care services through the National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care (One21seventy). Used in conjunction with the systems assessment tool, the tool will be used to identify evidence-practice gaps, determine systems-related facilitators and barriers to quality care enhance the quality of sexual health care delivered to, and ultimately reduce the burden of STIs among, Indigenous Australians.